Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSMX vs PMBPX
CCSMX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts CCSMX vs PMBPX
Conestoga SMid Cap Investors
Price$25.61
Change+$0.29 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets665.65M
CCSMX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSMX vs. PMBPX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSMX is a StrongBuy and PMBPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 32.3B vs. CCSMX (666M). PMBPX pays higher dividends than CCSMX: PMBPX (0.01) vs CCSMX (0.00). CCSMX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: CCSMX (11 years) vs PMBPX (25 years). CCSMX (1.54) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). PMBPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.50 vs. CCSMX (9.00). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSMX: PMBPX (0) vs CCSMX (2500). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.41 vs. CCSMX (11.79). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 59.60 vs. CCSMX (44.28).
| CCSMX | PMBPX | CCSMX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.83 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.83 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.039 | 7.041 | 1% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 666M | 32.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.79 | 15.41 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.54 | 52.39 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.28 | 59.60 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.30 | 104.46 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers