Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSMX vs PMBMX
CCSMX vs PMBMX Comparison
Open Charts CCSMX vs PMBMX
Conestoga SMid Cap Investors
Price$25.61
Change+$0.29 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets665.65M
CCSMX vs PMBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSMX vs. PMBMX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSMX is a StrongBuy and PMBMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBMX has more cash in the bank: 32.3B vs. CCSMX (666M). PMBMX pays higher dividends than CCSMX: PMBMX (0.02) vs CCSMX (0.00). CCSMX was incepted earlier than PMBMX: CCSMX (11 years) vs PMBMX (25 years). CCSMX (1.54) is less costly to investors than PMBMX (1.14). PMBMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.50 vs. CCSMX (9.00). PMBMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSMX: PMBMX (0) vs CCSMX (2500). PMBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.80 vs. CCSMX (11.79). PMBMX return over 5 years is better than : 55.71 vs. CCSMX (44.28).
| CCSMX | PMBMX | CCSMX / PMBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.14 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.14 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.039 | 6.854 | 1% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 666M | 32.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.79 | 14.80 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.54 | 50.19 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.28 | 55.71 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.30 | 94.74 | 179% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement