Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSMX vs PMBCX
CCSMX vs PMBCX Comparison
Open Charts CCSMX vs PMBCX
Conestoga SMid Cap Investors
Price$25.61
Change+$0.29 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets665.65M
CCSMX vs PMBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSMX vs. PMBCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSMX is a StrongBuy and PMBCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBCX has more cash in the bank: 32.3B vs. CCSMX (666M). CCSMX (0.00) and PMBCX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCSMX was incepted earlier than PMBCX: CCSMX (11 years) vs PMBCX (18 years). PMBCX (1.75) is less costly to investors than CCSMX (1.54). PMBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.50 vs. CCSMX (9.00). PMBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSMX: PMBCX (1000) vs CCSMX (2500). PMBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.57 vs. CCSMX (11.79). PMBCX return over 5 years is better than : 47.59 vs. CCSMX (44.28).
| CCSMX | PMBCX | CCSMX / PMBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.75 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.75 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.039 | 6.553 | 1% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 666M | 32.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.79 | 13.57 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.54 | 45.58 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.28 | 47.59 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.30 | 75.67 | 224% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers