CCSI
Price
$22.96
Change
-$0.32 (-1.37%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
304.68M
43 days until earnings call
SLVFF
Price
$0.29
Change
+$0.09 (+45.00%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
717.46M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCSI vs SLVFF

Header iconCCSI vs SLVFF Comparison
Open Charts CCSI vs SLVFFBanner chart's image
Consensus Cloud Solutions
Price$22.96
Change-$0.32 (-1.37%)
Volume$314.95K
Capitalization304.68M
Silverlake Axis
Price$0.29
Change+$0.09 (+45.00%)
Volume$4.5K
Capitalization717.46M
CCSI vs SLVFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCSI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCSI vs. SLVFF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSI is a Buy and SLVFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CCSI: $22.96 vs. SLVFF: $0.29)
Brand notoriety: CCSI and SLVFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCSI: 203% vs. SLVFF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CCSI: $304.68M vs. SLVFF: $717.46M
CCSI [@Packaged Software] is valued at $304.68M. SLVFF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $717.46M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCSI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLVFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CCSI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLVFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLVFF is a better buy in the long-term than CCSI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCSI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CCSI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

CCSI (@Packaged Software) experienced а +4.79% price change this week, while SLVFF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

CCSI is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.15% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLVFF($717M) has a higher market cap than CCSI($305M). SLVFF has higher P/E ratio than CCSI: SLVFF (19.23) vs CCSI (3.96). SLVFF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. CCSI (-3.772). SLVFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 271M vs. CCSI (166M). SLVFF has higher revenues than CCSI: SLVFF (737M) vs CCSI (363M).
CCSISLVFFCCSI / SLVFF
Capitalization305M717M43%
EBITDA166M271M61%
Gain YTD-3.7720.000-
P/E Ratio3.9619.2321%
Revenue363M737M49%
Total Cash88.7MN/A-
Total Debt749MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLVFF: Fundamental Ratings
SLVFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83
SMR RATING
1..100
49
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCSISLVFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCSI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHGCY26.350.06
+0.23%
Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
BCNAY7.96N/A
N/A
Barco NV
ENBP17.00N/A
N/A
ENB Financial Corp.
MFBP19.00N/A
N/A
M&F Bancorp, Inc.
WDPSF24.15-0.05
-0.22%
WAREHOUSES DE PAUW NV

CCSI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCSI has been loosely correlated with QLYS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCSI jumps, then QLYS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCSI
1D Price
Change %
CCSI100%
-1.37%
QLYS - CCSI
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.53%
EVCM - CCSI
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.15%
UPBD - CCSI
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.29%
OSPN - CCSI
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
PCTY - CCSI
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
More

SLVFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLVFF has been loosely correlated with CCSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLVFF jumps, then CCSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLVFF
1D Price
Change %
SLVFF100%
N/A
CCSI - SLVFF
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.37%
BNZI - SLVFF
39%
Loosely correlated
-2.96%
EXSPF - SLVFF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GEN - SLVFF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
MSGM - SLVFF
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.49%
More