Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSGX vs PMBPX
CCSGX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs PMBPX
Conestoga SMid Cap Institutional
Price$26.31
Change+$0.30 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets665.65M
CCSGX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. PMBPX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a StrongBuy and PMBPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 32.3B vs. CCSGX (666M). PMBPX pays higher dividends than CCSGX: PMBPX (0.01) vs CCSGX (0.00). CCSGX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: CCSGX (11 years) vs PMBPX (25 years). CCSGX (1.02) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). PMBPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.50 vs. CCSGX (9.00). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: PMBPX (0) vs CCSGX (250000). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.41 vs. CCSGX (12.10). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 59.60 vs. CCSGX (46.09).
| CCSGX | PMBPX | CCSGX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.83 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.83 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.190 | 7.041 | 3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 666M | 32.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.10 | 15.41 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.62 | 52.39 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.09 | 59.60 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 176.08 | 104.46 | 169% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement