Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSGX vs PMBJX
CCSGX vs PMBJX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs PMBJX
Conestoga SMid Cap Institutional
Price$26.43
Change+$0.11 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets658.02M
CCSGX vs PMBJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. PMBJX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a Buy and PMBJX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBJX has more cash in the bank: 33.2B vs. CCSGX (658M). PMBJX pays higher dividends than CCSGX: PMBJX (0.06) vs CCSGX (0.00). CCSGX was incepted earlier than PMBJX: CCSGX (11 years) vs PMBJX (24 years). CCSGX (1.02) is less costly to investors than PMBJX (0.78). PMBJX (10.50) and CCSGX (10.00) have comparable annual turnover. PMBJX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: PMBJX (1000) vs CCSGX (250000). PMBJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.47 vs. CCSGX (6.14). PMBJX return over 5 years is better than : 55.02 vs. CCSGX (42.56).
| CCSGX | PMBJX | CCSGX / PMBJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.78 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.78 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.647 | 8.650 | 7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 1000 | 25,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 658M | 33.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.14 | 13.47 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.16 | 48.88 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.56 | 55.02 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 177.33 | 103.26 | 172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement