Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSGX vs PMAQX
CCSGX vs PMAQX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs PMAQX
Conestoga SMid Cap Institutional
Price$26.55
Change+$0.41 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets653.15M
CCSGX vs PMAQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. PMAQX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a Buy and PMAQX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMAQX has more cash in the bank: 33B vs. CCSGX (653M). PMAQX pays higher dividends than CCSGX: PMAQX (0.18) vs CCSGX (0.00). CCSGX was incepted earlier than PMAQX: CCSGX (11 years) vs PMAQX (9 years). CCSGX (1.02) is less costly to investors than PMAQX (0.59). PMAQX (10.50) and CCSGX (10.00) have comparable annual turnover. PMAQX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: PMAQX (0) vs CCSGX (250000). PMAQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.52 vs. CCSGX (6.37). PMAQX return over 5 years is better than : 49.78 vs. CCSGX (38.28).
| CCSGX | PMAQX | CCSGX / PMAQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.59 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.59 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.104 | 7.192 | 15% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 653M | 33B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.18 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.37 | 9.52 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.21 | 47.43 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.28 | 49.78 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 191.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement