Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSGX vs PEMGX
CCSGX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs PEMGX
Conestoga SMid Cap Institutional
Price$26.43
Change+$0.11 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets658.02M
CCSGX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. PEMGX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a Buy and PEMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 33.2B vs. CCSGX (658M). CCSGX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCSGX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: CCSGX (11 years) vs PEMGX (20 years). CCSGX (1.02) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). PEMGX (10.50) and CCSGX (10.00) have comparable annual turnover. PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: PEMGX (1000) vs CCSGX (250000). PEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.43 vs. CCSGX (6.14). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 55.06 vs. CCSGX (42.56).
| CCSGX | PEMGX | CCSGX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.91 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.91 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.647 | 8.564 | 8% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 1000 | 25,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 658M | 33.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.14 | 13.43 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.16 | 48.78 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.56 | 55.06 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 177.33 | 103.87 | 171% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement