Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSGX vs PEMGX
CCSGX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs PEMGX
Conestoga SMid Cap Institutional
Price$24.37
Change-$0.19 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets576.24M
CCSGX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. PEMGX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a Buy and PEMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 31.6B vs. CCSGX (576M). CCSGX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCSGX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: CCSGX (11 years) vs PEMGX (20 years). CCSGX (1.02) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). PEMGX (10.50) and CCSGX (10.00) have comparable annual turnover. PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: PEMGX (1000) vs CCSGX (250000). PEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.04 vs. CCSGX (-12.89). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 26.10 vs. CCSGX (14.99).
| CCSGX | PEMGX | CCSGX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.91 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.91 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.331 | 1.689 | -316% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 1000 | 25,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 576M | 31.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.89 | -8.04 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.25 | 31.57 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.99 | 26.10 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 160.04 | 93.59 | 171% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers