It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCRN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLTGHY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCRN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LTGHY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CCRN (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а -2.45% price change this week, while LTGHY (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was +6.99% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was +5.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.48%.
CCRN is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.
CCRN | LTGHY | CCRN / LTGHY | |
Capitalization | 417M | 1.1B | 38% |
EBITDA | -387K | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -29.956 | -4.317 | 694% |
P/E Ratio | 48.72 | 10.51 | 464% |
Revenue | 1.26B | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 80.7M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 3.31M | N/A | - |
CCRN | LTGHY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 7 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 69 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 71 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LTGHY's Valuation (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CCRN (85) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that LTGHY’s stock grew significantly faster than CCRN’s over the last 12 months.
LTGHY's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as CCRN (79) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that LTGHY’s stock grew similarly to CCRN’s over the last 12 months.
CCRN's SMR Rating (92) in the Personnel Services industry is in the same range as LTGHY (97) in the null industry. This means that CCRN’s stock grew similarly to LTGHY’s over the last 12 months.
LTGHY's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as CCRN (63) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that LTGHY’s stock grew similarly to CCRN’s over the last 12 months.
CCRN's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Personnel Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for LTGHY (71) in the null industry. This means that CCRN’s stock grew significantly faster than LTGHY’s over the last 12 months.
CCRN | LTGHY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago88% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago69% | 4 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 4 days ago74% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago67% | 4 days ago80% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 4 days ago75% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% | 4 days ago70% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago73% | 4 days ago69% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago79% | 11 days ago63% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 4 days ago71% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago78% | 4 days ago70% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCRN has been loosely correlated with AMN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCRN jumps, then AMN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCRN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CCRN | 100% | +1.52% | ||
AMN - CCRN | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.89% | ||
LFST - CCRN | 26% Poorly correlated | +12.05% | ||
ACHC - CCRN | 26% Poorly correlated | +5.71% | ||
MD - CCRN | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
PIII - CCRN | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.90% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LTGHY and CCRN have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LTGHY and CCRN's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LTGHY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LTGHY | 100% | +0.31% | ||
CCRN - LTGHY | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.52% | ||
JRSS - LTGHY | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
HLYK - LTGHY | 7% Poorly correlated | -6.02% | ||
NVLPF - LTGHY | 6% Poorly correlated | +18.70% | ||
KJFI - LTGHY | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |