CCRDF
Price
$6.75
Change
+$0.38 (+5.97%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
5.59B
MSBB
Price
$14.85
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCRDF vs MSBB

Header iconCCRDF vs MSBB Comparison
Open Charts CCRDF vs MSBBBanner chart's image
Concordia Financial Group
Price$6.75
Change+$0.38 (+5.97%)
Volume$400
Capitalization5.59B
Mercer Ban
Price$14.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$400
CapitalizationN/A
CCRDF vs MSBB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSBB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCRDF vs. MSBB commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCRDF is a Buy and MSBB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CCRDF: $6.75 vs. MSBB: $14.85)
Brand notoriety: CCRDF and MSBB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCRDF: 88% vs. MSBB: 52%
Market capitalization -- CCRDF: $5.59B vs. MSBB: $0
CCRDF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $5.59B. MSBB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCRDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMSBB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCRDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MSBB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCRDF is a better buy in the long-term than MSBB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCRDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSBB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCRDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • MSBB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CCRDF is a better buy in the short-term than MSBB.

Price Growth

CCRDF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.97% price change this week, while MSBB (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCRDF YTD gains are higher at: 15.681 vs. MSBB (6.071).
CCRDFMSBBCCRDF / MSBB
Capitalization5.59BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.6816.071258%
P/E Ratio12.48N/A-
Revenue268BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.28TN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCRDF: Fundamental Ratings
CCRDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
15
SMR RATING
1..100
1
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCRDFMSBB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
1%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSBB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AOR62.060.13
+0.21%
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allc ETF
TSEC26.180.03
+0.10%
Touchstone Securitized Income ETF
QTJA27.860.01
+0.03%
Innovator Growth Accelerated Pls ETF Jan
OBNB20.00N/A
N/A
Osprey BNB Chain Trust
EVN10.61-0.01
-0.09%
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust

CCRDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCRDF and SUTNY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCRDF and SUTNY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCRDF
1D Price
Change %
CCRDF100%
+5.97%
SUTNY - CCRDF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
LLAZF - CCRDF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MFG - CCRDF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
BCAL - CCRDF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
DSBX - CCRDF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.66%
More

MSBB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSBB and FNWD have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSBB and FNWD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSBB
1D Price
Change %
MSBB100%
N/A
FNWD - MSBB
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.37%
BKIMF - MSBB
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KPCPY - MSBB
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.44%
CCRDF - MSBB
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.97%
SFGIF - MSBB
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More