CCRDF
Price
$7.41
Change
+$0.66 (+9.78%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
8.6B
MFG
Price
$6.51
Change
-$0.03 (-0.46%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
81.41B
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCRDF vs MFG

Header iconCCRDF vs MFG Comparison
Open Charts CCRDF vs MFGBanner chart's image
Concordia Financial Group
Price$7.41
Change+$0.66 (+9.78%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization8.6B
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$6.51
Change-$0.03 (-0.46%)
Volume$2.05M
Capitalization81.41B
CCRDF vs MFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCRDF vs. MFG commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCRDF is a Hold and MFG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CCRDF: $7.41 vs. MFG: $6.51)
Brand notoriety: CCRDF and MFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCRDF: 126% vs. MFG: 70%
Market capitalization -- CCRDF: $8.6B vs. MFG: $81.41B
CCRDF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $8.6B. MFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $81.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCRDF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMFG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CCRDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCRDF is a better buy in the long-term than MFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCRDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCRDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • MFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFG is a better buy in the short-term than CCRDF.

Price Growth

CCRDF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MFG (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFG is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFG($81.4B) has a higher market cap than CCRDF($8.6B). CCRDF has higher P/E ratio than MFG: CCRDF (15.31) vs MFG (13.69). MFG YTD gains are higher at: 33.129 vs. CCRDF (26.992). CCRDF has less debt than MFG: CCRDF (2.26T) vs MFG (22.19T). MFG has higher revenues than CCRDF: MFG (3.61T) vs CCRDF (314B).
CCRDFMFGCCRDF / MFG
Capitalization8.6B81.4B11%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD26.99233.12981%
P/E Ratio15.3113.69112%
Revenue314B3.61T9%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.26T22.19T10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCRDF vs MFG: Fundamental Ratings
CCRDF
MFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5080
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
815
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4344
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2725
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCRDF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as MFG (72) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CCRDF’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

CCRDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as MFG (15) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CCRDF’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

CCRDF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as MFG (1) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CCRDF’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

CCRDF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as MFG (44) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CCRDF’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CCRDF (27) in the null industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to CCRDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCRDFMFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EDIV38.590.24
+0.63%
SPDR® S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
VEU69.740.44
+0.63%
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US ETF
OPP8.750.05
+0.57%
RiverNorth/DoubleLine Strategic Opportunity Fund
TMAR21.56N/A
N/A
FT Vest Emerging Mkts Buffr ETF - Mar
ARCM100.28N/A
N/A
Arrow Reserve Capital Management ETF

CCRDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCRDF and SUTNY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCRDF and SUTNY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCRDF
1D Price
Change %
CCRDF100%
N/A
SUTNY - CCRDF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
LLAZF - CCRDF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MFG - CCRDF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
BCAL - CCRDF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
DSBX - CCRDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
More

MFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFG has been loosely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MFG jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFG
1D Price
Change %
MFG100%
-0.46%
NWG - MFG
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.13%
DB - MFG
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
HBAN - MFG
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.40%
WNEB - MFG
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
TFC - MFG
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.17%
More