Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCQYX vs RWMFX
CCQYX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts CCQYX vs RWMFX
Columbia Disciplined Core Inst3
Price$16.47
Change+$0.10 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.03B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.77
Change+$0.42 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.25B
CCQYX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCQYX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCQYX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. CCQYX (5.03B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than CCQYX: RWMFX (1.43) vs CCQYX (0.82). CCQYX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: CCQYX (10 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). CCQYX (0.66) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). CCQYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCQYX: RWMFX (250) vs CCQYX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.69 vs. CCQYX (2.98). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 57.64 vs. CCQYX (41.32).
| CCQYX | RWMFX | CCQYX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.31 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.31 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.685 | 9.760 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.03B | 207B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.43 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.98 | 5.69 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.20 | 46.35 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.32 | 57.64 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.73 | 93.97 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement