CCPPF
Price
$2.15
Change
+$0.05 (+2.38%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
3.01B
MNARF
Price
$13.39
Change
+$0.16 (+1.21%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
481.15M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCPPF vs MNARF

Header iconCCPPF vs MNARF Comparison
Open Charts CCPPF vs MNARFBanner chart's image
Capital & Counties Properties PLC, London
Price$2.15
Change+$0.05 (+2.38%)
Volume$1.55K
Capitalization3.01B
Morguard North American Residential Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$13.39
Change+$0.16 (+1.21%)
Volume$7.9K
Capitalization481.15M
CCPPF vs MNARF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNARF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCPPF vs. MNARF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCPPF is a Hold and MNARF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CCPPF: $2.15 vs. MNARF: $13.39)
Brand notoriety: CCPPF and MNARF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCPPF: 154% vs. MNARF: 247%
Market capitalization -- CCPPF: $3.01B vs. MNARF: $481.15M
CCPPF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $3.01B. MNARF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $481.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCPPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMNARF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CCPPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MNARF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNARF is a better buy in the long-term than CCPPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCPPF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNARF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCPPF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • MNARF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNARF is a better buy in the short-term than CCPPF.

Price Growth

CCPPF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +2.52% price change this week, while MNARF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.52% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCPPF($3.01B) has a higher market cap than MNARF($481M). MNARF has higher P/E ratio than CCPPF: MNARF (7.64) vs CCPPF (6.94). CCPPF YTD gains are higher at: 13.013 vs. MNARF (11.863). MNARF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 196M vs. CCPPF (-178.4M). CCPPF has more cash in the bank: 116M vs. MNARF (24.2M). CCPPF has less debt than MNARF: CCPPF (744M) vs MNARF (1.58B). MNARF has higher revenues than CCPPF: MNARF (293M) vs CCPPF (74.1M).
CCPPFMNARFCCPPF / MNARF
Capitalization3.01B481M625%
EBITDA-178.4M196M-91%
Gain YTD13.01311.863110%
P/E Ratio6.947.6491%
Revenue74.1M293M25%
Total Cash116M24.2M479%
Total Debt744M1.58B47%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCPPF vs MNARF: Fundamental Ratings
CCPPF
MNARF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8555
SMR RATING
1..100
9182
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3852
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1715
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNARF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCPPF (76). This means that MNARF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCPPF’s over the last 12 months.

MNARF's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as CCPPF (85). This means that MNARF’s stock grew similarly to CCPPF’s over the last 12 months.

MNARF's SMR Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as CCPPF (91). This means that MNARF’s stock grew similarly to CCPPF’s over the last 12 months.

CCPPF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as MNARF (52). This means that CCPPF’s stock grew similarly to MNARF’s over the last 12 months.

MNARF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as CCPPF (17). This means that MNARF’s stock grew similarly to CCPPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCPPFMNARF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
26%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
32%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
25%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
24%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNARF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GCCAX20.530.65
+3.27%
GMO Climate Change R6
GRSPX26.710.30
+1.14%
Cromwell Greenspring Mid Cap Instl
VRTTX535.274.58
+0.86%
Vanguard Russell 3000 Index I
FWWMX64.590.54
+0.84%
American Funds Washington Mutual 529-F-3
VMFGX461.603.57
+0.78%
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Idx I

CCPPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCPPF has been loosely correlated with MNARF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCPPF jumps, then MNARF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCPPF
1D Price
Change %
CCPPF100%
N/A
MNARF - CCPPF
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AEDFF - CCPPF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IIPZF - CCPPF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CWYUF - CCPPF
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
CDPYF - CCPPF
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
More

MNARF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNARF has been loosely correlated with CCPPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNARF jumps, then CCPPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNARF
1D Price
Change %
MNARF100%
N/A
CCPPF - MNARF
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AEDFF - MNARF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JRFIF - MNARF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WRDEF - MNARF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWHUF - MNARF
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
More