CCPPF
Price
$2.15
Change
+$0.05 (+2.38%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
3.01B
DBMBF
Price
$1.64
Change
+$0.03 (+1.86%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.48B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCPPF vs DBMBF

Header iconCCPPF vs DBMBF Comparison
Open Charts CCPPF vs DBMBFBanner chart's image
Capital & Counties Properties PLC, London
Price$2.15
Change+$0.05 (+2.38%)
Volume$1.55K
Capitalization3.01B
Deutsche Bank Mexico SA
Price$1.64
Change+$0.03 (+1.86%)
Volume$15.4K
Capitalization1.48B
CCPPF vs DBMBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DBMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCPPF vs. DBMBF commentary
Jul 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCPPF is a Hold and DBMBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CCPPF: $2.15 vs. DBMBF: $1.64)
Brand notoriety: CCPPF and DBMBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCPPF: 154% vs. DBMBF: 367%
Market capitalization -- CCPPF: $3.01B vs. DBMBF: $1.48B
CCPPF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $3.01B. DBMBF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $1.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCPPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDBMBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCPPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DBMBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DBMBF is a better buy in the long-term than CCPPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCPPF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DBMBF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCPPF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • DBMBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CCPPF is a better buy in the short-term than DBMBF.

Price Growth

CCPPF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +2.52% price change this week, while DBMBF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -0.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.40%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.28% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCPPF($3.01B) has a higher market cap than DBMBF($1.48B). DBMBF has higher P/E ratio than CCPPF: DBMBF (12.47) vs CCPPF (6.94). CCPPF YTD gains are higher at: 13.013 vs. DBMBF (10.811). DBMBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.83B vs. CCPPF (-178.4M). DBMBF has more cash in the bank: 414M vs. CCPPF (116M). CCPPF has less debt than DBMBF: CCPPF (744M) vs DBMBF (16B). DBMBF has higher revenues than CCPPF: DBMBF (4.11B) vs CCPPF (74.1M).
CCPPFDBMBFCCPPF / DBMBF
Capitalization3.01B1.48B203%
EBITDA-178.4M2.83B-6%
Gain YTD13.01310.811120%
P/E Ratio6.9412.4756%
Revenue74.1M4.11B2%
Total Cash116M414M28%
Total Debt744M16B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCPPF vs DBMBF: Fundamental Ratings
CCPPF
DBMBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8547
SMR RATING
1..100
9136
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3857
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1794
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DBMBF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCPPF (76). This means that DBMBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCPPF’s over the last 12 months.

DBMBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCPPF (85). This means that DBMBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCPPF’s over the last 12 months.

DBMBF's SMR Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCPPF (91). This means that DBMBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCPPF’s over the last 12 months.

CCPPF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as DBMBF (57). This means that CCPPF’s stock grew similarly to DBMBF’s over the last 12 months.

CCPPF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DBMBF (94). This means that CCPPF’s stock grew significantly faster than DBMBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCPPFDBMBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DBMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GCCAX20.530.65
+3.27%
GMO Climate Change R6
GRSPX26.710.30
+1.14%
Cromwell Greenspring Mid Cap Instl
VRTTX535.274.58
+0.86%
Vanguard Russell 3000 Index I
FWWMX64.590.54
+0.84%
American Funds Washington Mutual 529-F-3
VMFGX461.603.57
+0.78%
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Idx I

CCPPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCPPF has been loosely correlated with MNARF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCPPF jumps, then MNARF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCPPF
1D Price
Change %
CCPPF100%
N/A
MNARF - CCPPF
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AEDFF - CCPPF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IIPZF - CCPPF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CWYUF - CCPPF
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
CDPYF - CCPPF
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
More

DBMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DBMBF and TKURF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DBMBF and TKURF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DBMBF
1D Price
Change %
DBMBF100%
N/A
TKURF - DBMBF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNBLF - DBMBF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCPPF - DBMBF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CROMF - DBMBF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDPYF - DBMBF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
More