CCORF
Price
$7.76
Change
+$0.10 (+1.31%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
623.61M
NRSCF
Price
$6.41
Change
+$0.61 (+10.52%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
12.83B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCORF vs NRSCF

Header iconCCORF vs NRSCF Comparison
Open Charts CCORF vs NRSCFBanner chart's image
Canaccord Genuity Group
Price$7.76
Change+$0.10 (+1.31%)
Volume$8.46K
Capitalization623.61M
Nomura Holdings
Price$6.41
Change+$0.61 (+10.52%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization12.83B
CCORF vs NRSCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCORF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NRSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCORF vs. NRSCF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCORF is a Hold and NRSCF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CCORF: $7.76 vs. NRSCF: $6.41)
Brand notoriety: CCORF and NRSCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCORF: 44% vs. NRSCF: 108%
Market capitalization -- CCORF: $623.61M vs. NRSCF: $12.83B
CCORF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $623.61M. NRSCF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $12.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCORF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNRSCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CCORF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NRSCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NRSCF is a better buy in the long-term than CCORF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCORF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NRSCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCORF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NRSCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NRSCF is a better buy in the short-term than CCORF.

Price Growth

CCORF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +2.65% price change this week, while NRSCF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +10.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +6.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +114.88%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+6.13% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRSCF($12.8B) has a higher market cap than CCORF($624M). NRSCF has higher P/E ratio than CCORF: NRSCF (18.52) vs CCORF (10.94). NRSCF YTD gains are higher at: 11.595 vs. CCORF (10.463). CCORF has less debt than NRSCF: CCORF (434M) vs NRSCF (11.4T). NRSCF has higher revenues than CCORF: NRSCF (1.12T) vs CCORF (1.51B).
CCORFNRSCFCCORF / NRSCF
Capitalization624M12.8B5%
EBITDA88.1MN/A-
Gain YTD10.46311.59590%
P/E Ratio10.9418.5259%
Revenue1.51B1.12T0%
Total Cash1.72BN/A-
Total Debt434M11.4T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCORF vs NRSCF: Fundamental Ratings
CCORF
NRSCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6550
SMR RATING
1..100
911
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4253
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6296
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NRSCF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is in the same range as CCORF (30). This means that NRSCF’s stock grew similarly to CCORF’s over the last 12 months.

NRSCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as CCORF (65). This means that NRSCF’s stock grew similarly to CCORF’s over the last 12 months.

NRSCF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CCORF (91). This means that NRSCF’s stock grew significantly faster than CCORF’s over the last 12 months.

CCORF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as NRSCF (53). This means that CCORF’s stock grew similarly to NRSCF’s over the last 12 months.

CCORF's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NRSCF (96). This means that CCORF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NRSCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCORFNRSCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
32%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCORF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NRSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SHIM2.010.08
+4.15%
Shimmick Corp
REAL5.310.07
+1.34%
RealReal (The)
NMRK12.510.02
+0.16%
Newmark Group
GIGGU10.54N/A
N/A
GigCapital7 Corp
AGCO109.70-0.85
-0.77%
AGCO Corp

CCORF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCORF and MQBKY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCORF and MQBKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCORF
1D Price
Change %
CCORF100%
+1.25%
MQBKY - CCORF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
DMGGF - CCORF
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.28%
NRSCF - CCORF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPPTF - CCORF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
XAUMF - CCORF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NRSCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NRSCF and SAIH have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NRSCF and SAIH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NRSCF
1D Price
Change %
NRSCF100%
N/A
SAIH - NRSCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.52%
CCORF - NRSCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
STGC - NRSCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MIGI - NRSCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.19%
MQBKY - NRSCF
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
More