CCORF
Price
$7.76
Change
+$0.10 (+1.31%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
623.61M
CGXYY
Price
$26.50
Change
+$3.87 (+17.10%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Capitalization
14.46B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCORF vs CGXYY

Header iconCCORF vs CGXYY Comparison
Open Charts CCORF vs CGXYYBanner chart's image
Canaccord Genuity Group
Price$7.76
Change+$0.10 (+1.31%)
Volume$8.46K
Capitalization623.61M
China Galaxy Securities
Price$26.50
Change+$3.87 (+17.10%)
Volume$105
Capitalization14.46B
CCORF vs CGXYY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCORF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CGXYY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCORF vs. CGXYY commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCORF is a Hold and CGXYY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CCORF: $7.76 vs. CGXYY: $26.50)
Brand notoriety: CCORF and CGXYY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCORF: 44% vs. CGXYY: 77%
Market capitalization -- CCORF: $623.61M vs. CGXYY: $14.46B
CCORF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $623.61M. CGXYY’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $14.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCORF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCGXYY’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • CCORF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CGXYY’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGXYY is a better buy in the long-term than CCORF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCORF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CGXYY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCORF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CGXYY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CGXYY is a better buy in the short-term than CCORF.

Price Growth

CCORF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +2.65% price change this week, while CGXYY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +6.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +114.88%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+6.13% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXYY($14.5B) has a higher market cap than CCORF($624M). CGXYY has higher P/E ratio than CCORF: CGXYY (131.58) vs CCORF (10.94). CGXYY YTD gains are higher at: 19.369 vs. CCORF (10.463). CGXYY has higher revenues than CCORF: CGXYY (18.6B) vs CCORF (1.51B).
CCORFCGXYYCCORF / CGXYY
Capitalization624M14.5B4%
EBITDA88.1MN/A-
Gain YTD10.46319.36954%
P/E Ratio10.94131.588%
Revenue1.51B18.6B8%
Total Cash1.72BN/A-
Total Debt434MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCORF vs CGXYY: Fundamental Ratings
CCORF
CGXYY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
658
SMR RATING
1..100
917
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4240
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6218
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
144

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGXYY's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as CCORF (30). This means that CGXYY’s stock grew similarly to CCORF’s over the last 12 months.

CGXYY's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCORF (65). This means that CGXYY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCORF’s over the last 12 months.

CGXYY's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CCORF (91). This means that CGXYY’s stock grew significantly faster than CCORF’s over the last 12 months.

CGXYY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CCORF (42). This means that CGXYY’s stock grew similarly to CCORF’s over the last 12 months.

CGXYY's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCORF (62). This means that CGXYY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCORF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCORFCGXYY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
10%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
5%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
5%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCORF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CGXYY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HLEIX94.240.80
+0.86%
JPMorgan Equity Index I
MLMAX22.490.18
+0.81%
Morgan Stanley Instl Global Core A
SGMIX10.800.06
+0.56%
SEI Global Managed Volatility I (SIMT)
ACLCX7.920.03
+0.38%
American Century Value C
FRRSX15.490.02
+0.13%
Franklin Real Estate Securities C

CCORF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCORF and MQBKY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCORF and MQBKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCORF
1D Price
Change %
CCORF100%
+1.25%
MQBKY - CCORF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
DMGGF - CCORF
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.28%
NRSCF - CCORF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPPTF - CCORF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
XAUMF - CCORF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CGXYY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGXYY and BTBT have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGXYY and BTBT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGXYY
1D Price
Change %
CGXYY100%
N/A
BTBT - CGXYY
21%
Poorly correlated
+11.79%
BTCWF - CGXYY
6%
Poorly correlated
+9.74%
CIIHF - CGXYY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLVDF - CGXYY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCORF - CGXYY
0%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
More