CCOEF
Price
$27.18
Change
+$0.86 (+3.27%)
Updated
Apr 16 closing price
Capitalization
9.51B
ZI
Price
$8.70
Change
-$0.09 (-1.02%)
Updated
Apr 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.09B
14 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CCOEF vs ZI

Header iconCCOEF vs ZI Comparison
Open Charts CCOEF vs ZIBanner chart's image
Capcom
Price$27.18
Change+$0.86 (+3.27%)
Volume$400
Capitalization9.51B
ZoomInfo Technologies
Price$8.70
Change-$0.09 (-1.02%)
Volume$213.86K
Capitalization6.09B
CCOEF vs ZI Comparison Chart
Loading...
ZI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCOEF vs. ZI commentary
Apr 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCOEF is a Hold and ZI is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CCOEF: $27.18 vs. ZI: $8.79)
Brand notoriety: CCOEF and ZI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCOEF: 2% vs. ZI: 69%
Market capitalization -- CCOEF: $9.51B vs. ZI: $6.09B
CCOEF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $9.51B. ZI’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $6.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCOEF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileZI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCOEF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • ZI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCOEF is a better buy in the long-term than ZI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ZI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ZI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

CCOEF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ZI (@Packaged Software) price change was +9.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +7.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

ZI is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+7.96% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCOEF($9.51B) has a higher market cap than ZI($6.09B). ZI has higher P/E ratio than CCOEF: ZI (59.41) vs CCOEF (27.25). CCOEF YTD gains are higher at: 24.102 vs. ZI (-16.365). CCOEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 67.8B vs. ZI (515M). CCOEF has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. ZI (529M). ZI has less debt than CCOEF: ZI (1.33B) vs CCOEF (7.84B). CCOEF has higher revenues than ZI: CCOEF (145B) vs ZI (1.24B).
CCOEFZICCOEF / ZI
Capitalization9.51B6.09B156%
EBITDA67.8B515M13,165%
Gain YTD24.102-16.365-147%
P/E Ratio27.2559.4146%
Revenue145B1.24B11,694%
Total Cash109B529M20,605%
Total Debt7.84B1.33B588%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCOEF: Fundamental Ratings
CCOEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
87
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6
SMR RATING
1..100
10
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ZI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ZI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA284.9525.44
+9.80%
Tesla
GME27.460.38
+1.40%
GameStop Corp
SPY550.643.95
+0.72%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL209.280.91
+0.44%
Apple
BTC.X93754.840000-892.085940
-0.94%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

CCOEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCOEF and ASFT have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCOEF and ASFT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCOEF
1D Price
Change %
CCOEF100%
N/A
ASFT - CCOEF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ONEI - CCOEF
22%
Poorly correlated
+39.22%
ZI - CCOEF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
NTDOY - CCOEF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
ADSK - CCOEF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
More

ZI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZI has been loosely correlated with DOX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZI jumps, then DOX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZI
1D Price
Change %
ZI100%
+0.69%
DOX - ZI
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
RPD - ZI
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
SHOP - ZI
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.10%
HUBS - ZI
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.50%
DV - ZI
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
More