It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCOEF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNTDOY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCOEF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTDOY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
CCOEF (@Electronics/Appliances) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NTDOY (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was +0.54% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was -2.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.77%.
NTDOY is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.
TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.
CCOEF | NTDOY | CCOEF / NTDOY | |
Capitalization | 11.3B | 104B | 11% |
EBITDA | 48.5B | 536B | 9% |
Gain YTD | 26.484 | 53.520 | 49% |
P/E Ratio | 35.39 | 55.52 | 64% |
Revenue | 134B | 1.4T | 10% |
Total Cash | 126B | 2.02T | 6% |
Total Debt | 6.97B | N/A | - |
CCOEF | NTDOY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 46 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 19 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 47 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CCOEF's Valuation (80) in the null industry is in the same range as NTDOY (89). This means that CCOEF’s stock grew similarly to NTDOY’s over the last 12 months.
CCOEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as NTDOY (19). This means that CCOEF’s stock grew similarly to NTDOY’s over the last 12 months.
NTDOY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CCOEF (12). This means that NTDOY’s stock grew similarly to CCOEF’s over the last 12 months.
NTDOY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CCOEF (51). This means that NTDOY’s stock grew similarly to CCOEF’s over the last 12 months.
NTDOY's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCOEF (50). This means that NTDOY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCOEF’s over the last 12 months.
CCOEF | NTDOY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago50% | 1 day ago67% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago52% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago45% | 1 day ago59% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago57% | 1 day ago56% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago47% | 1 day ago55% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago40% | 1 day ago53% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago58% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago53% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago62% | 1 day ago57% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago30% | 1 day ago45% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CCOEF and ASFT have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCOEF and ASFT's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCOEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CCOEF | 100% | N/A | ||
ASFT - CCOEF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ONEI - CCOEF | 22% Poorly correlated | +5.60% | ||
GTM - CCOEF | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.09% | ||
NTDOY - CCOEF | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
ADSK - CCOEF | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.01% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTDOY has been loosely correlated with NTDOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTDOY jumps, then NTDOF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTDOY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NTDOY | 100% | -0.27% | ||
NTDOF - NTDOY | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
CCOEY - NTDOY | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.59% | ||
TMICY - NTDOY | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
ADYEY - NTDOY | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
ADYYF - NTDOY | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.69% | ||
More |