Advertisement
CCOEF vs GTM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCOEF is a StrongBuy and GTM is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCOEF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGTM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CCOEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- GTM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCOEF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GTM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCOEF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
- GTM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CCOEF (@Electronics/Appliances) experienced а -3.30% price change this week, while GTM (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.11% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was +6.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.24%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +110.84%.
Reported Earning Dates
GTM is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronics/Appliances (+6.98% weekly)TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.
@Packaged Software (-0.06% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CCOEF | GTM | CCOEF / GTM | |
| Capitalization | 11.3B | 3.62B | 313% |
| EBITDA | 48.5B | 251M | 19,323% |
| Gain YTD | 22.203 | 7.992 | 278% |
| P/E Ratio | 34.11 | 45.40 | 75% |
| Revenue | 134B | 1.23B | 10,939% |
| Total Cash | 126B | 177M | 71,186% |
| Total Debt | 6.97B | 1.56B | 447% |
CCOEF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CCOEF | GTM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 65% |
Advertisement
CCOEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CCOEF and ASFT have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCOEF and ASFT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCOEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCOEF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ASFT - CCOEF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ONEI - CCOEF | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.89% | ||
| GTM - CCOEF | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.39% | ||
| NTDOY - CCOEF | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.61% | ||
| ADSK - CCOEF | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
More | ||||
GTM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTM has been loosely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTM jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GTM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTM | 100% | -1.39% | ||
| HUBS - GTM | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.68% | ||
| DOX - GTM | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.17% | ||
| EVCM - GTM | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| PCOR - GTM | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| CPAY - GTM | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.37% | ||
More | ||||