CCNB
Price
$11.59
Change
+$0.02 (+0.17%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
56.43M
UNCFF
Price
$72.35
Change
-$1.65 (-2.23%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
45.77B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCNB vs UNCFF

Header iconCCNB vs UNCFF Comparison
Open Charts CCNB vs UNCFFBanner chart's image
Coastal Carolina Bancshares
Price$11.59
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
Volume$2.7K
Capitalization56.43M
UniCredito Spa
Price$72.35
Change-$1.65 (-2.23%)
Volume$2.91K
Capitalization45.77B
CCNB vs UNCFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCNB vs. UNCFF commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCNB is a Buy and UNCFF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CCNB: $11.59 vs. UNCFF: $72.35)
Brand notoriety: CCNB and UNCFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCNB: 82% vs. UNCFF: 42%
Market capitalization -- CCNB: $56.43M vs. UNCFF: $45.77B
CCNB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $56.43M. UNCFF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $45.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCNB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUNCFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CCNB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UNCFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCNB is a better buy in the long-term than UNCFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCNB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNCFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCNB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UNCFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UNCFF is a better buy in the short-term than CCNB.

Price Growth

CCNB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.93% price change this week, while UNCFF (@Regional Banks) price change was +6.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UNCFF($45.8B) has a higher market cap than CCNB($56.4M). CCNB has higher P/E ratio than UNCFF: CCNB (7.80) vs UNCFF (5.29). UNCFF YTD gains are higher at: 80.803 vs. CCNB (6.330). CCNB has less debt than UNCFF: CCNB (25M) vs UNCFF (93B). UNCFF has higher revenues than CCNB: UNCFF (23.1B) vs CCNB (26.7M).
CCNBUNCFFCCNB / UNCFF
Capitalization56.4M45.8B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.33080.8038%
P/E Ratio7.805.29147%
Revenue26.7M23.1B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt25M93B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCNB vs UNCFF: Fundamental Ratings
CCNB
UNCFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
224
SMR RATING
1..100
523
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5039
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4737
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCNB's Valuation (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNCFF (81). This means that CCNB’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNCFF’s over the last 12 months.

UNCFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as CCNB (22). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew similarly to CCNB’s over the last 12 months.

UNCFF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCNB (52). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCNB’s over the last 12 months.

UNCFF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as CCNB (50). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew similarly to CCNB’s over the last 12 months.

UNCFF's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as CCNB (47). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew similarly to CCNB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCNBUNCFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSAI0.860.11
+15.14%
MultiSensor AI Holdings
SPG167.112.15
+1.30%
Simon Property Group
SLN6.340.06
+0.96%
Silence Therapeutics Plc
SYM52.99-0.43
-0.80%
Symbotic
GPCR17.94-0.33
-1.81%
Structure Therapeutics

CCNB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCNB and KGTFY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCNB and KGTFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCNB
1D Price
Change %
CCNB100%
+0.17%
KGTFY - CCNB
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNCFF - CCNB
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.23%
WFCL - CCNB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INBC - CCNB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPHLF - CCNB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

UNCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNCFF has been loosely correlated with ISNPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNCFF jumps, then ISNPY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNCFF
1D Price
Change %
UNCFF100%
-2.23%
ISNPY - UNCFF
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
CRZBY - UNCFF
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
MDIBY - UNCFF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
BKRIF - UNCFF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPHLF - UNCFF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More