CCLD
Price
$2.37
Change
-$0.04 (-1.66%)
Updated
Jun 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
18.54M
30 days until earnings call
FHGDF
Price
$0.10
Change
+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
103.09M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCLD vs FHGDF

Header iconCCLD vs FHGDF Comparison
Open Charts CCLD vs FHGDFBanner chart's image
CareCloud
Price$2.37
Change-$0.04 (-1.66%)
Volume$2.11K
Capitalization18.54M
Founder Holdings
Price$0.10
Change+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization103.09M
CCLD vs FHGDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FHGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCLD vs. FHGDF commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCLD is a Buy and FHGDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (CCLD: $2.41 vs. FHGDF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: CCLD and FHGDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCLD: 58% vs. FHGDF: 128%
Market capitalization -- CCLD: $18.54M vs. FHGDF: $103.09M
CCLD [@Packaged Software] is valued at $18.54M. FHGDF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $103.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCLD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFHGDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCLD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FHGDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHGDF is a better buy in the long-term than CCLD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCLD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FHGDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCLD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FHGDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CCLD is a better buy in the short-term than FHGDF.

Price Growth

CCLD (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.60% price change this week, while FHGDF (@Packaged Software) price change was +10.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

CCLD is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.75% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHGDF($103M) has a higher market cap than CCLD($18.5M). FHGDF YTD gains are higher at: -7.554 vs. CCLD (-34.153). FHGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.6M vs. CCLD (-30.8M). FHGDF has more cash in the bank: 444M vs. CCLD (3.33M). FHGDF has less debt than CCLD: FHGDF (5.57M) vs CCLD (14.7M). FHGDF has higher revenues than CCLD: FHGDF (942M) vs CCLD (117M).
CCLDFHGDFCCLD / FHGDF
Capitalization18.5M103M18%
EBITDA-30.8M15.6M-197%
Gain YTD-34.153-7.554452%
P/E RatioN/A21.55-
Revenue117M942M12%
Total Cash3.33M444M1%
Total Debt14.7M5.57M264%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCLD vs FHGDF: Fundamental Ratings
CCLD
FHGDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10049
SMR RATING
1..100
9390
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4143
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1005
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCLD's Valuation (39) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FHGDF (45) in the null industry. This means that CCLD’s stock grew similarly to FHGDF’s over the last 12 months.

FHGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCLD (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FHGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCLD’s over the last 12 months.

FHGDF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as CCLD (93) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FHGDF’s stock grew similarly to CCLD’s over the last 12 months.

CCLD's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FHGDF (43) in the null industry. This means that CCLD’s stock grew similarly to FHGDF’s over the last 12 months.

FHGDF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CCLD (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FHGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than CCLD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCLDFHGDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FHGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KWR115.150.86
+0.75%
Quaker Houghton
SLRC16.090.01
+0.06%
SLR Investment Corp
SOGP4.42-0.07
-1.56%
Sound Group
ADM51.98-1.19
-2.24%
Archer Daniels Midland Company
DSX1.51-0.07
-4.43%
Diana Shipping

CCLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCLD has been loosely correlated with PRTH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCLD jumps, then PRTH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCLD
1D Price
Change %
CCLD100%
+5.70%
PRTH - CCLD
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.78%
MDB - CCLD
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
UPLD - CCLD
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.12%
ACON - CCLD
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
BASE - CCLD
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
More

FHGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FHGDF and LIDR have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FHGDF and LIDR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FHGDF
1D Price
Change %
FHGDF100%
N/A
LIDR - FHGDF
30%
Poorly correlated
+12.21%
CCLD - FHGDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+5.70%
API - FHGDF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
SSTI - FHGDF
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.99%
KSIOF - FHGDF
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
More