CCL
Price
$28.61
Change
+$0.24 (+0.85%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
38.47B
46 days until earnings call
RGS
Price
$18.91
Change
-$0.51 (-2.63%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:21 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
47.31M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCL vs RGS

Header iconCCL vs RGS Comparison
Open Charts CCL vs RGSBanner chart's image
Carnival
Price$28.61
Change+$0.24 (+0.85%)
Volume$137.89K
Capitalization38.47B
Regis
Price$18.91
Change-$0.51 (-2.63%)
Volume$262
Capitalization47.31M
CCL vs RGS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCL vs. RGS commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCL is a StrongBuy and RGS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (CCL: $28.37 vs. RGS: $19.42)
Brand notoriety: CCL: Notable vs. RGS: Not notable
CCL represents the Consumer Sundries, while RGS is part of the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCL: 76% vs. RGS: 59%
Market capitalization -- CCL: $38.47B vs. RGS: $47.31M
CCL [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $38.47B. RGS’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $47.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $175.2B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $28.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $16.87B. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRGS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCL is a better buy in the long-term than RGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RGS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CCL is a better buy in the short-term than RGS.

Price Growth

CCL (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а -2.41% price change this week, while RGS (@Personnel Services) price change was +2.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +1.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.13%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -0.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

CCL is expected to report earnings on Sep 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (+1.18% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

@Personnel Services (-0.45% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCL($38.5B) has a higher market cap than RGS($47.3M). CCL has higher P/E ratio than RGS: CCL (14.85) vs RGS (0.51). CCL YTD gains are higher at: 13.844 vs. RGS (-18.128). CCL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.75B vs. RGS (116M). CCL has more cash in the bank: 2.15B vs. RGS (13.3M). RGS has less debt than CCL: RGS (368M) vs CCL (28.6B). CCL has higher revenues than RGS: CCL (26B) vs RGS (199M).
CCLRGSCCL / RGS
Capitalization38.5B47.3M81,395%
EBITDA6.75B116M5,820%
Gain YTD13.844-18.128-76%
P/E Ratio14.850.512,896%
Revenue26B199M13,065%
Total Cash2.15B13.3M16,135%
Total Debt28.6B368M7,772%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCL vs RGS: Fundamental Ratings
CCL
RGS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
62100
SMR RATING
1..100
337
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4064
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8373
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4424

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGS's Valuation (81) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CCL (88) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that RGS’s stock grew similarly to CCL’s over the last 12 months.

CCL's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGS (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CCL’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGS’s over the last 12 months.

RGS's SMR Rating (7) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CCL (33) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that RGS’s stock grew similarly to CCL’s over the last 12 months.

CCL's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as RGS (64) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CCL’s stock grew similarly to RGS’s over the last 12 months.

RGS's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CCL (83) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that RGS’s stock grew similarly to CCL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCLRGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
78%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SAT24.910.04
+0.16%
Saratoga Investment Corp
BGX12.480.01
+0.08%
Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund
MARB20.71-0.02
-0.07%
First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF
SCHE31.02-0.08
-0.26%
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF™
IFN15.27-0.10
-0.65%
India Fund (The)

CCL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCL has been closely correlated with CUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 99% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CCL jumps, then CUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCL
1D Price
Change %
CCL100%
-2.21%
CUK - CCL
99%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
NCLH - CCL
87%
Closely correlated
-1.92%
RCL - CCL
85%
Closely correlated
N/A
VIK - CCL
75%
Closely correlated
N/A
TNL - CCL
69%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
More

RGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RGS and TRIP have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGS and TRIP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGS
1D Price
Change %
RGS100%
-1.67%
TRIP - RGS
28%
Poorly correlated
+11.68%
BKNG - RGS
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
RCL - RGS
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TNL - RGS
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
CCL - RGS
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.21%
More