CCL
Price
$31.89
Change
-$0.60 (-1.85%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
43.24B
24 days until earnings call
RGS
Price
$22.40
Change
+$0.25 (+1.13%)
Updated
Sep 2, 10:38 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
53.96M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCL vs RGS

Header iconCCL vs RGS Comparison
Open Charts CCL vs RGSBanner chart's image
Carnival
Price$31.89
Change-$0.60 (-1.85%)
Volume$14.83M
Capitalization43.24B
Regis
Price$22.40
Change+$0.25 (+1.13%)
Volume$100
Capitalization53.96M
CCL vs RGS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCL vs. RGS commentary
Sep 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCL is a StrongBuy and RGS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 02, 2025
Stock price -- (CCL: $31.89 vs. RGS: $22.15)
Brand notoriety: CCL: Notable vs. RGS: Not notable
CCL represents the Consumer Sundries, while RGS is part of the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCL: 74% vs. RGS: 49%
Market capitalization -- CCL: $43.24B vs. RGS: $53.96M
CCL [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $43.24B. RGS’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $53.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $181.46B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $27.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.66B. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRGS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCL is a better buy in the long-term than RGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RGS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CCL and RGS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CCL (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а +1.88% price change this week, while RGS (@Personnel Services) price change was +11.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.09%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was +1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

CCL is expected to report earnings on Sep 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (+2.15% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

@Personnel Services (+1.44% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCL($43.2B) has a higher market cap than RGS($54M). CCL has higher P/E ratio than RGS: CCL (16.70) vs RGS (0.58). CCL YTD gains are higher at: 27.970 vs. RGS (-6.619). CCL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.75B vs. RGS (116M). CCL has more cash in the bank: 2.15B vs. RGS (13.3M). RGS has less debt than CCL: RGS (368M) vs CCL (28.6B). CCL has higher revenues than RGS: CCL (26B) vs RGS (199M).
CCLRGSCCL / RGS
Capitalization43.2B54M80,000%
EBITDA6.75B116M5,820%
Gain YTD27.970-6.619-423%
P/E Ratio16.700.582,855%
Revenue26B199M13,065%
Total Cash2.15B13.3M16,135%
Total Debt28.6B368M7,772%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCL vs RGS: Fundamental Ratings
CCL
RGS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
55100
SMR RATING
1..100
337
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
351
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8554
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9047

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGS's Valuation (80) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CCL (88) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that RGS’s stock grew similarly to CCL’s over the last 12 months.

CCL's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGS (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CCL’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGS’s over the last 12 months.

RGS's SMR Rating (7) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CCL (33) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that RGS’s stock grew similarly to CCL’s over the last 12 months.

CCL's Price Growth Rating (3) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGS (51) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CCL’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGS’s over the last 12 months.

RGS's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CCL (85) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that RGS’s stock grew similarly to CCL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCLRGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QDIV35.340.08
+0.22%
Global X S&P 500® Quality Dividend ETF
YJUN24.78-0.11
-0.45%
FT Vest Intl Eq Mod Bf ETF June
GMMA21.05-0.10
-0.46%
GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF
SPTM78.26-0.47
-0.60%
SPDR® Port S&P 1500 Comps Stk Mkt ETF
NVDU116.91-8.14
-6.51%
Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares

CCL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCL has been closely correlated with CUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 99% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CCL jumps, then CUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCL
1D Price
Change %
CCL100%
-1.85%
CUK - CCL
99%
Closely correlated
-1.69%
NCLH - CCL
87%
Closely correlated
-2.17%
RCL - CCL
85%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
VIK - CCL
75%
Closely correlated
-0.24%
TNL - CCL
70%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
More

RGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RGS and TRIP have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGS and TRIP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGS
1D Price
Change %
RGS100%
+5.63%
TRIP - RGS
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
BKNG - RGS
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
RCL - RGS
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
TNL - RGS
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
CCL - RGS
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
More