It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNTRP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTRP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CCL (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а +4.90% price change this week, while NTRP (@Consumer Sundries) price change was -11.91% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +2.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.42%.
CCL is expected to report earnings on Sep 26, 2025.
Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.
CCL | NTRP | CCL / NTRP | |
Capitalization | 40.4B | 27.9M | 144,803% |
EBITDA | 6.75B | -10M | -67,521% |
Gain YTD | 19.422 | -41.128 | -47% |
P/E Ratio | 15.58 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 26B | 451K | 5,764,967% |
Total Cash | 2.15B | 131K | 1,638,168% |
Total Debt | 28.6B | 2.35M | 1,219,096% |
CCL | NTRP | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 33 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 44 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NTRP's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as CCL (88) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that NTRP’s stock grew similarly to CCL’s over the last 12 months.
CCL's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTRP (100) in the null industry. This means that CCL’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTRP’s over the last 12 months.
CCL's SMR Rating (33) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for NTRP (100) in the null industry. This means that CCL’s stock grew significantly faster than NTRP’s over the last 12 months.
CCL's Price Growth Rating (5) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTRP (44) in the null industry. This means that CCL’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTRP’s over the last 12 months.
CCL's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as NTRP (100) in the null industry. This means that CCL’s stock grew similarly to NTRP’s over the last 12 months.
CCL | NTRP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 7 days ago88% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago86% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | 3 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago62% | 3 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago90% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago90% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago78% | 10 days ago86% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago82% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCL has been closely correlated with CUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 99% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CCL jumps, then CUK could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that NTRP and HSWLF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTRP and HSWLF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTRP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NTRP | 100% | -7.79% | ||
HSWLF - NTRP | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
TNL - NTRP | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.99% | ||
SDRMF - NTRP | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
IVP - NTRP | 10% Poorly correlated | -8.77% | ||
CCL - NTRP | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.62% | ||
More |