CCL
Price
$31.33
Change
+$0.17 (+0.55%)
Updated
Sep 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
42.48B
22 days until earnings call
LIND
Price
$14.29
Change
-$0.05 (-0.35%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
782.66M
56 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCL vs LIND

Header iconCCL vs LIND Comparison
Open Charts CCL vs LINDBanner chart's image
Carnival
Price$31.33
Change+$0.17 (+0.55%)
Volume$116.03K
Capitalization42.48B
Lindblad Expeditions Holdings
Price$14.29
Change-$0.05 (-0.35%)
Volume$330.61K
Capitalization782.66M
CCL vs LIND Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LIND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCL vs. LIND commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCL is a StrongBuy and LIND is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CCL: $31.16 vs. LIND: $14.33)
Brand notoriety: CCL: Notable vs. LIND: Not notable
Both companies represent the Consumer Sundries industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCL: 80% vs. LIND: 107%
Market capitalization -- CCL: $42.48B vs. LIND: $782.66M
CCL [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $42.48B. LIND’s [@Consumer Sundries] market capitalization is $782.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $180.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLIND’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CCL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LIND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCL is a better buy in the long-term than LIND.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIND’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LIND’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CCL and LIND are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CCL (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а -2.23% price change this week, while LIND (@Consumer Sundries) price change was -2.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +3.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

CCL is expected to report earnings on Sep 26, 2025.

LIND is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (+3.35% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCL($42.5B) has a higher market cap than LIND($783M). CCL YTD gains are higher at: 25.040 vs. LIND (20.826). CCL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.75B vs. LIND (96.1M). CCL has more cash in the bank: 2.15B vs. LIND (201M). LIND has less debt than CCL: LIND (628M) vs CCL (28.6B). CCL has higher revenues than LIND: CCL (26B) vs LIND (702M).
CCLLINDCCL / LIND
Capitalization42.5B783M5,428%
EBITDA6.75B96.1M7,025%
Gain YTD25.04020.826120%
P/E Ratio16.40N/A-
Revenue26B702M3,704%
Total Cash2.15B201M1,068%
Total Debt28.6B628M4,554%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCL vs LIND: Fundamental Ratings
CCL
LIND
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6822
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5768
SMR RATING
1..100
33100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
339
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8497
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8590

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCL's Valuation (88) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as LIND (88) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CCL’s stock grew similarly to LIND’s over the last 12 months.

CCL's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as LIND (68) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CCL’s stock grew similarly to LIND’s over the last 12 months.

CCL's SMR Rating (33) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for LIND (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CCL’s stock grew significantly faster than LIND’s over the last 12 months.

CCL's Price Growth Rating (3) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LIND (39) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CCL’s stock grew somewhat faster than LIND’s over the last 12 months.

CCL's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as LIND (97) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CCL’s stock grew similarly to LIND’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCLLIND
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LIND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BGX12.50N/A
N/A
Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund
FLHY24.26-0.01
-0.06%
Franklin High Yield Corporate ETF
VPL85.74-0.28
-0.33%
Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF
PSTR28.27-0.11
-0.39%
PeakShares Sector Rotation ETF
QTAP42.94-0.29
-0.67%
Innovator Growth-100 Acltd Ps ETF™ April

CCL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCL has been closely correlated with CUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 99% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CCL jumps, then CUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCL
1D Price
Change %
CCL100%
-2.29%
CUK - CCL
99%
Closely correlated
-2.41%
NCLH - CCL
87%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
RCL - CCL
85%
Closely correlated
-2.52%
VIK - CCL
77%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
TNL - CCL
70%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
More

LIND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIND has been loosely correlated with CUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIND jumps, then CUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIND
1D Price
Change %
LIND100%
-1.71%
CUK - LIND
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.41%
CCL - LIND
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.29%
NCLH - LIND
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
RCL - LIND
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.52%
VIK - LIND
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
More