Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCKTX vs MFJCX
CCKTX vs MFJCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCKTX vs. MFJCX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCKTX is a Hold and MFJCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCKTX has more cash in the bank: 18.3B vs. MFJCX (258M). MFJCX pays higher dividends than CCKTX: MFJCX (1.34) vs CCKTX (0.15). CCKTX was incepted earlier than MFJCX: CCKTX (11 years) vs MFJCX (9 years). MFJCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than CCKTX (1.47). MFJCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. CCKTX (5.00). CCKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFJCX: CCKTX (250) vs MFJCX (1000). CCKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.71 vs. MFJCX (9.74). MFJCX return over 5 years is better than : 49.38 vs. CCKTX (44.35).
| CCKTX | MFJCX | CCKTX / MFJCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.58 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.93 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.231 | 14.080 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.3B | 258M | 7,093% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 1.34 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.71 | 9.74 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.45 | 47.59 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.35 | 49.38 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.83 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement