Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCIZX vs WSTCX
CCIZX vs WSTCX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs WSTCX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$209.44
Change+$12.55 (+6.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.49B
Nomura Science and Technology C
Price$84.91
Change-$5.36 (-5.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.96B
CCIZX vs WSTCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. WSTCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Hold and WSTCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 20.5B vs. WSTCX (6.96B). CCIZX (0.00) and WSTCX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than WSTCX: CCIZX (15 years) vs WSTCX (29 years). WSTCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.91). WSTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. CCIZX (33.00). WSTCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCIZX: WSTCX (1000) vs CCIZX (2000). CCIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.56 vs. WSTCX (20.29). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 63.14 vs. WSTCX (-62.23).
| CCIZX | WSTCX | CCIZX / WSTCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.92 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.93 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.412 | 6.940 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.5B | 6.96B | 294% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.56 | 20.29 | 190% |
| Returns for 3 years | 91.08 | 15.05 | 605% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.14 | -62.23 | -101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 303.93 | -24.18 | -1,257% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers