Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCIZX vs WSTCX
CCIZX vs WSTCX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs WSTCX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$208.45
Change+$1.78 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.04B
Nomura Science and Technology C
Price$79.03
Change-$10.12 (-11.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.65B
CCIZX vs WSTCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. WSTCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a StrongBuy and WSTCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 19B vs. WSTCX (6.65B). CCIZX (0.00) and WSTCX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than WSTCX: CCIZX (15 years) vs WSTCX (28 years). WSTCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.91). WSTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. CCIZX (33.00). WSTCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCIZX: WSTCX (1000) vs CCIZX (2000). CCIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.24 vs. WSTCX (-8.05). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 68.05 vs. WSTCX (-61.40).
| CCIZX | WSTCX | CCIZX / WSTCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.92 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.93 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.245 | 31.432 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19B | 6.65B | 286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.24 | -8.05 | -264% |
| Returns for 3 years | 84.41 | 28.42 | 297% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.05 | -61.40 | -111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 205.22 | -36.65 | -560% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers