Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCIZX vs WSTAX
CCIZX vs WSTAX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs WSTAX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$204.19
Change-$3.03 (-1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.79B
Nomura Science and Technology A
Price$60.67
Change-$0.82 (-1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.86B
CCIZX vs WSTAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. WSTAX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Hold and WSTAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 19.8B vs. WSTAX (6.86B). CCIZX (0.00) and WSTAX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than WSTAX: CCIZX (15 years) vs WSTAX (26 years). WSTAX (1.18) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.91). WSTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. CCIZX (33.00). WSTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCIZX: WSTAX (1000) vs CCIZX (2000). CCIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.37 vs. WSTAX (17.30). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 65.42 vs. WSTAX (-32.98).
| CCIZX | WSTAX | CCIZX / WSTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.17 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.18 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.644 | 4.802 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.8B | 6.86B | 288% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.37 | 17.30 | 222% |
| Returns for 3 years | 101.37 | 54.02 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.42 | -32.98 | -198% |
| Returns for 10 years | 294.42 | 36.61 | 804% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers