Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCIZX vs WSTAX
CCIZX vs WSTAX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs WSTAX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$163.30
Change+$0.49 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.09B
Macquarie Science and Technology A
Price$61.32
Change+$0.24 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.31B
CCIZX vs WSTAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. WSTAX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and WSTAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 15.1B vs. WSTAX (6.31B). CCIZX (0.00) and WSTAX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than WSTAX: CCIZX (15 years) vs WSTAX (25 years). WSTAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.93). WSTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. CCIZX (39.00). WSTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCIZX: WSTAX (1000) vs CCIZX (2000). WSTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.72 vs. CCIZX (12.01). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 69.29 vs. WSTAX (-20.61).
| CCIZX | WSTAX | CCIZX / WSTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.16 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.16 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.122 | 19.672 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.1B | 6.31B | 239% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.01 | 13.72 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.54 | 21.45 | 222% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.29 | -20.61 | -336% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.57 | 11.47 | 1,374% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers