Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCIZX vs WFTDX
CCIZX vs WFTDX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs WFTDX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$174.32
Change+$2.39 (+1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.25B
Allspring Innovation Fund - Class Admin
Price$12.90
Change+$0.09 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets414.96M
CCIZX vs WFTDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. WFTDX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and WFTDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 16.3B vs. WFTDX (415M). CCIZX (0.00) and WFTDX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than WFTDX: CCIZX (15 years) vs WFTDX (15 years). WFTDX (1.23) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.93). WFTDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. CCIZX (33.00). CCIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFTDX: CCIZX (2000) vs WFTDX (1000000). CCIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.16 vs. WFTDX (3.75). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 75.01 vs. WFTDX (-30.46).
| CCIZX | WFTDX | CCIZX / WFTDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.15 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.23 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.104 | 5.353 | 357% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.3B | 415M | 3,928% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.16 | 3.75 | 590% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.85 | 9.44 | 687% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.01 | -30.46 | -246% |
| Returns for 10 years | 191.45 | 25.14 | 761% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers