Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCIZX vs WFSTX
CCIZX vs WFSTX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs WFSTX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$208.45
Change+$1.78 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.04B
Allspring Innovation Fund -
Price$12.16
Change+$0.12 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets392.95M
CCIZX vs WFSTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. WFSTX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a StrongBuy and WFSTX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 19B vs. WFSTX (393M). CCIZX (0.00) and WFSTX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than WFSTX: CCIZX (15 years) vs WFSTX (25 years). WFSTX (1.30) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.91). WFSTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. CCIZX (33.00). WFSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCIZX: WFSTX (1000) vs CCIZX (2000). CCIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.24 vs. WFSTX (-11.29). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 68.05 vs. WFSTX (-42.79).
| CCIZX | WFSTX | CCIZX / WFSTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.22 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.30 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.245 | 2.401 | 1,551% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19B | 393M | 4,835% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.24 | -11.29 | -188% |
| Returns for 3 years | 84.41 | 7.57 | 1,115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.05 | -42.79 | -159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 205.22 | 4.55 | 4,507% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers