Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCIZX vs RCGTX
CCIZX vs RCGTX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs RCGTX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$208.45
Change+$1.78 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.04B
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology C
Price$17.19
Change+$0.04 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7B
CCIZX vs RCGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. RCGTX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a StrongBuy and RCGTX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 19B vs. RCGTX (1.7B). CCIZX (0.00) and RCGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than RCGTX: CCIZX (15 years) vs RCGTX (24 years). RCGTX (2.17) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.91). CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RCGTX (2.00). CCIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCGTX: CCIZX (2000) vs RCGTX (2500). CCIZX (24.10) and RCGTX (23.49) have marching annual gain over last year. CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 68.43 vs. RCGTX (-69.69).
| CCIZX | RCGTX | CCIZX / RCGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.17 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.17 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.569 | 25.474 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19B | 1.7B | 1,117% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.10 | 23.49 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.88 | 12.57 | 707% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.43 | -69.69 | -98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 212.61 | -66.68 | -319% |