Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCIZX vs NWHTX
CCIZX vs NWHTX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs NWHTX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$157.70
Change+$2.26 (+1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.61B
Nationwide Bailard Tech & Sci R6
Price$33.55
Change+$0.55 (+1.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets195.74M
CCIZX vs NWHTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. NWHTX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and NWHTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 14.6B vs. NWHTX (196M). CCIZX (0.00) and NWHTX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than NWHTX: CCIZX (15 years) vs NWHTX (12 years). CCIZX (0.93) is less costly to investors than NWHTX (0.88). CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. NWHTX (20.38). CCIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWHTX: CCIZX (2000) vs NWHTX (1000000). CCIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.89 vs. NWHTX (-2.02). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 67.14 vs. NWHTX (24.17).
| CCIZX | NWHTX | CCIZX / NWHTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.88 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.88 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.346 | 12.095 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.6B | 196M | 7,449% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.89 | -2.02 | -94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.03 | 63.90 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.14 | 24.17 | 278% |
| Returns for 10 years | 145.29 | 94.40 | 154% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers