Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCIZX vs NWHTX
CCIZX vs NWHTX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs NWHTX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$145.53
Change-$2.79 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.52B
Nationwide Bailard Tech & Sci R6
Price$31.32
Change-$0.55 (-1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets183.78M
CCIZX vs NWHTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. NWHTX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and NWHTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 13.5B vs. NWHTX (184M). CCIZX (0.00) and NWHTX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than NWHTX: CCIZX (15 years) vs NWHTX (12 years). CCIZX (0.93) is less costly to investors than NWHTX (0.88). CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. NWHTX (20.38). CCIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWHTX: CCIZX (2000) vs NWHTX (1000000). CCIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.80 vs. NWHTX (-4.34). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 63.19 vs. NWHTX (24.83).
| CCIZX | NWHTX | CCIZX / NWHTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.88 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.88 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.861 | 4.644 | -40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.5B | 184M | 7,337% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.80 | -4.34 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.02 | 54.44 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.19 | 24.83 | 254% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.18 | 76.58 | 153% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement