Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCIZX vs NWHOX
CCIZX vs NWHOX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs NWHOX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$145.53
Change-$2.79 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.52B
Nationwide Bailard Tech & Sci A
Price$27.47
Change-$0.49 (-1.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets183.78M
CCIZX vs NWHOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. NWHOX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and NWHOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 13.5B vs. NWHOX (184M). CCIZX (0.00) and NWHOX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than NWHOX: CCIZX (15 years) vs NWHOX (19 years). NWHOX (1.20) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.93). CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. NWHOX (20.38). CCIZX (2000) and NWHOX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CCIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.80 vs. NWHOX (-6.12). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 63.19 vs. NWHOX (16.35).
| CCIZX | NWHOX | CCIZX / NWHOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.20 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.20 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.861 | 4.449 | -42% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.5B | 184M | 7,337% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.80 | -6.12 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.02 | 47.93 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.19 | 16.35 | 386% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.18 | 61.44 | 191% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement