Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCIZX vs CTHCX
CCIZX vs CTHCX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs CTHCX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$174.32
Change+$2.39 (+1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.04B
Columbia Global Technology Growth C
Price$84.48
Change+$0.45 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.1B
CCIZX vs CTHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. CTHCX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and CTHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. CTHCX (4.1B). CCIZX (0.00) and CTHCX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than CTHCX: CCIZX (15 years) vs CTHCX (22 years). CTHCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.93). CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. CTHCX (7.00). CCIZX (2000) and CTHCX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CTHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.62 vs. CCIZX (22.16). CTHCX return over 5 years is better than : 88.15 vs. CCIZX (75.01).
| CCIZX | CTHCX | CCIZX / CTHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.92 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.92 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.104 | 15.127 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16B | 4.1B | 390% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.16 | 28.62 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.85 | 99.34 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.01 | 88.15 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 191.45 | 399.00 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers