CCIX
Price
$10.51
Change
-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Updated
Sep 5, 01:09 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
385.69M
GPAT
Price
$10.60
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
380.94M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCIX vs GPAT

Header iconCCIX vs GPAT Comparison
Open Charts CCIX vs GPATBanner chart's image
Churchill Capital Corp IX
Price$10.51
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Volume$200
Capitalization385.69M
GP-Act III Acquisition
Price$10.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$676
Capitalization380.94M
CCIX vs GPAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCIX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCIX vs. GPAT commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIX is a Hold and GPAT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CCIX: $10.52 vs. GPAT: $10.60)
Brand notoriety: CCIX and GPAT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCIX: 43% vs. GPAT: 1%
Market capitalization -- CCIX: $385.69M vs. GPAT: $380.94M
CCIX [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $385.69M. GPAT’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $380.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $171.68M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCIX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGPAT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CCIX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GPAT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCIX is a better buy in the long-term than GPAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCIX’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CCIX’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

CCIX (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -0.43% price change this week, while GPAT (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.01% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIX($386M) and GPAT($381M) have the same market capitalization . CCIX has higher P/E ratio than GPAT: CCIX (45.40) vs GPAT (27.89). GPAT YTD gains are higher at: 4.536 vs. CCIX (2.136). GPAT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -669.21K vs. CCIX (-3.13M). CCIX has more cash in the bank: 426K vs. GPAT (246K). CCIX (0) and GPAT (0) have equivalent revenues.
CCIXGPATCCIX / GPAT
Capitalization386M381M101%
EBITDA-3.13M-669.21K468%
Gain YTD2.1364.53647%
P/E Ratio45.4027.89163%
Revenue00-
Total Cash426K246K173%
Total DebtN/A400K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCIX
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
12%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
7%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
8%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
2%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
43%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
8%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCIX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LSHCX24.500.34
+1.41%
Kinetics Spin-Off and Corp Rest Adv C
LGLSX54.750.75
+1.39%
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R4
CHDVX14.420.09
+0.63%
Cullen High Dividend Equity I
BMCIX29.430.14
+0.48%
BlackRock High Equity Income Instl
ZEMIX12.89-0.02
-0.15%
American Beacon Ninety One Emr Mkts EqR5

CCIX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCIX and ALFUU have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCIX and ALFUU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCIX
1D Price
Change %
CCIX100%
-0.28%
ALFUU - CCIX
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSHP - CCIX
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUB - CCIX
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
AACT - CCIX
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CEP - CCIX
12%
Poorly correlated
-9.54%
More

GPAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GPAT and QETA have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GPAT and QETA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPAT
1D Price
Change %
GPAT100%
N/A
QETA - GPAT
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DYCQ - GPAT
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NETDU - GPAT
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LPAAU - GPAT
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCIX - GPAT
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
More