CCIA
Price
$25.60
Change
-$0.04 (-0.16%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
OXLCN
Price
$24.21
Change
+$0.09 (+0.37%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCIA vs OXLCN

Header iconCCIA vs OXLCN Comparison
Open Charts CCIA vs OXLCNBanner chart's image
Carlyle Credit Income Fund
Price$25.60
Change-$0.04 (-0.16%)
Volume$4K
CapitalizationN/A
Oxford Lane Capital
Price$24.21
Change+$0.09 (+0.37%)
Volume$1.34K
CapitalizationN/A
CCIA vs OXLCN Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCIA vs. OXLCN commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIA is a StrongBuy and OXLCN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (CCIA: $25.60 vs. OXLCN: $24.21)
Brand notoriety: CCIA and OXLCN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCIA: 57% vs. OXLCN: 41%
Market capitalization -- CCIA: $0 vs. OXLCN: $0
CCIA [@Investment Managers] is valued at $0. OXLCN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCIA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOXLCN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCIA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OXLCN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OXLCN is a better buy in the long-term than CCIA.

Price Growth

CCIA (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.16% price change this week, while OXLCN (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.00%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.10% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OXLCN (2.880) and CCIA (2.876) have similar YTD gains . CCIA has less debt than OXLCN: CCIA (3.48M) vs OXLCN (195M). OXLCN has higher revenues than CCIA: OXLCN (142M) vs CCIA (-6.66M).
CCIAOXLCNCCIA / OXLCN
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.8762.880100%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue-6.66M142M-5%
Total Cash2.24MN/A-
Total Debt3.48M195M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OXLCN: Fundamental Ratings
OXLCN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
62
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBMO25.570.02
+0.06%
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bd ETF
ITM45.19-0.08
-0.18%
VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF
CXH7.60-0.01
-0.18%
MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust
HYBB46.35-0.12
-0.26%
iShares BB Rated Corporate Bond ETF
UPSD23.67-0.40
-1.64%
Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF

OXLCN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OXLCN has been loosely correlated with OCCIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OXLCN jumps, then OCCIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OXLCN
1D Price
Change %
OXLCN100%
+0.37%
OCCIN - OXLCN
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OXLCP - OXLCN
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
EICB - OXLCN
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
CCIA - OXLCN
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
ECCC - OXLCN
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
More