It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCHGY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCHFHY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCHGY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CHFHY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
CCHGY (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -1.87% price change this week, while CHFHY (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.88%.
CCHGY is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.
Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
CCHGY | CHFHY | CCHGY / CHFHY | |
Capitalization | 10.8B | 1.06B | 1,024% |
EBITDA | 1.11B | 2.28B | 49% |
Gain YTD | 59.750 | 0.000 | - |
P/E Ratio | 23.42 | 10.80 | 217% |
Revenue | 9.2B | 20.5B | 45% |
Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
CCHGY | CHFHY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | 7 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 55 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | 60 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 73 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 58 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CHFHY's Valuation (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCHGY (41). This means that CHFHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCHGY’s over the last 12 months.
CCHGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHFHY (55). This means that CCHGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHFHY’s over the last 12 months.
CCHGY's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CHFHY (60). This means that CCHGY’s stock grew similarly to CHFHY’s over the last 12 months.
CCHGY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHFHY (73). This means that CCHGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHFHY’s over the last 12 months.
CCHGY's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as CHFHY (58). This means that CCHGY’s stock grew similarly to CHFHY’s over the last 12 months.
CCHGY | CHFHY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago49% | 4 days ago13% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago55% | N/A |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago51% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago54% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago49% | 4 days ago17% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago49% | 4 days ago17% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago60% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago43% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago46% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago53% | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
GFSIX | 18.27 | 0.14 | +0.77% |
Gabelli Global Financial Services I | |||
CGVFX | 26.34 | 0.19 | +0.73% |
American Funds Global Insight 529-F-1 | |||
PQSIX | 46.49 | 0.25 | +0.54% |
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Index R6 | |||
OPMNX | 26.82 | 0.09 | +0.34% |
Invesco Main Street Mid Cap R | |||
RMYSX | 9.85 | 0.01 | +0.10% |
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income S |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CHFHY and CCOJY have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHFHY and CCOJY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHFHY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CHFHY | 100% | N/A | ||
CCOJY - CHFHY | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CCHGY - CHFHY | 1% Poorly correlated | -1.72% | ||
CCOJF - CHFHY | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CELH - CHFHY | -1% Poorly correlated | +1.03% | ||
KDP - CHFHY | -1% Poorly correlated | +0.12% | ||
More |