CCHBF
Price
$52.24
Change
-$0.50 (-0.95%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
10.85B
CELH
Price
$45.64
Change
-$0.92 (-1.98%)
Updated
Jul 7, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
19.3B
36 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCHBF vs CELH

Header iconCCHBF vs CELH Comparison
Open Charts CCHBF vs CELHBanner chart's image
COCA COLA HBC
Price$52.24
Change-$0.50 (-0.95%)
Volume$100
Capitalization10.85B
Celsius Holdings
Price$45.64
Change-$0.92 (-1.98%)
Volume$48.36K
Capitalization19.3B
CCHBF vs CELH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCHBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CELH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCHBF vs. CELH commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCHBF is a Hold and CELH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CCHBF: $52.24 vs. CELH: $46.56)
Brand notoriety: CCHBF and CELH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCHBF: 29% vs. CELH: 33%
Market capitalization -- CCHBF: $10.85B vs. CELH: $19.3B
CCHBF [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $10.85B. CELH’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $19.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $263.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $24.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCHBF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCELH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCHBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CELH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCHBF is a better buy in the long-term than CELH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCHBF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CELH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCHBF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CELH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CELH is a better buy in the short-term than CCHBF.

Price Growth

CCHBF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -0.94% price change this week, while CELH (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +2.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +1.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

CELH is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+1.92% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CELH($19.3B) has a higher market cap than CCHBF($10.8B). CELH has higher P/E ratio than CCHBF: CELH (107.25) vs CCHBF (25.84). CELH YTD gains are higher at: 76.765 vs. CCHBF (54.785). CCHBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.11B vs. CELH (270M). CCHBF has more cash in the bank: 1.78B vs. CELH (756M). CELH has less debt than CCHBF: CELH (2.19M) vs CCHBF (3.42B). CCHBF has higher revenues than CELH: CCHBF (9.2B) vs CELH (1.32B).
CCHBFCELHCCHBF / CELH
Capitalization10.8B19.3B56%
EBITDA1.11B270M410%
Gain YTD54.78576.76571%
P/E Ratio25.84107.2524%
Revenue9.2B1.32B698%
Total Cash1.78B756M236%
Total Debt3.42B2.19M156,379%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCHBF vs CELH: Fundamental Ratings
CCHBF
CELH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2558
SMR RATING
1..100
4146
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4240
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
438
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCHBF's Valuation (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CELH (94) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCHBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CELH’s over the last 12 months.

CCHBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CELH (58) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCHBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CELH’s over the last 12 months.

CCHBF's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CELH (46) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCHBF’s stock grew similarly to CELH’s over the last 12 months.

CELH's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CCHBF (42) in the null industry. This means that CELH’s stock grew similarly to CCHBF’s over the last 12 months.

CELH's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCHBF (43) in the null industry. This means that CELH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCHBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCHBFCELH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCHBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CELH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TTT75.061.51
+2.05%
ProShares UltraPro Short 20+ Year Trs
MSFO17.850.24
+1.35%
YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF
CSM71.250.51
+0.73%
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus
ACWV118.820.48
+0.41%
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
BUFI37.78N/A
-0.01%
AB International Buffer ETF

CCHBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCHBF and KDP have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCHBF and KDP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCHBF
1D Price
Change %
CCHBF100%
N/A
KDP - CCHBF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
CCHGY - CCHBF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.97%
CELH - CCHBF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
CCOJY - CCHBF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCOJF - CCHBF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CELH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CELH has been loosely correlated with MNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CELH jumps, then MNST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CELH
1D Price
Change %
CELH100%
+0.41%
MNST - CELH
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
KOF - CELH
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
COCO - CELH
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
FIZZ - CELH
20%
Poorly correlated
+4.59%
OTLY - CELH
17%
Poorly correlated
+3.52%
More