Advertisement
CCHBF vs CELH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCHBF is a Hold and CELH is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCHBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCELH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CCHBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CELH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCHBF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CELH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCHBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
- CELH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CCHBF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CELH (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +1.31% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.61%.
Reported Earning Dates
CELH is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-1.28% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| CCHBF | CELH | CCHBF / CELH | |
| Capitalization | 16.4B | 15.9B | 103% |
| EBITDA | 1.77B | 184M | 962% |
| Gain YTD | 37.481 | 134.852 | 28% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.93 | 162.79 | 10% |
| Revenue | 11.2B | 1.67B | 672% |
| Total Cash | 2.68B | 615M | 436% |
| Total Debt | 4.35B | 863M | 503% |
CCHBF | CELH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 96 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 41 | 54 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 34 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CCHBF's Valuation (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CELH (93) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCHBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CELH’s over the last 12 months.
CCHBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CELH (54) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCHBF’s stock grew similarly to CELH’s over the last 12 months.
CCHBF's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as CELH (66) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCHBF’s stock grew similarly to CELH’s over the last 12 months.
CELH's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CCHBF (60) in the null industry. This means that CELH’s stock grew similarly to CCHBF’s over the last 12 months.
CELH's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is significantly better than the same rating for CCHBF (69) in the null industry. This means that CELH’s stock grew significantly faster than CCHBF’s over the last 12 months.
| CCHBF | CELH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 36% | 8 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 39% | 8 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 31% | 8 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 19% | 8 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 33% | 8 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 15% | 8 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 23 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 25% | 8 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 19% | 8 days ago 83% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| UPGD | 74.61 | 0.90 | +1.22% |
| Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Imp ETF | |||
| VWID | 33.47 | 0.17 | +0.50% |
| Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF | |||
| DDLS | 41.49 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| WisdomTree Dynamic Intl SmCap Eq ETF | |||
| ADX | 22.49 | -0.03 | -0.13% |
| Adams Diversified Equity Fund | |||
| QXQ | 30.98 | -0.18 | -0.59% |
| SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF | |||
CCHBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CCHBF and KDP have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCHBF and KDP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCHBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCHBF | 100% | N/A | ||
| KDP - CCHBF | 8% Poorly correlated | +1.02% | ||
| CCHGY - CCHBF | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.82% | ||
| CELH - CCHBF | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.18% | ||
| CCOJY - CCHBF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CCOJF - CCHBF | -2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
CELH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CELH has been loosely correlated with MNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CELH jumps, then MNST could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CELH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CELH | 100% | +1.18% | ||
| MNST - CELH | 39% Loosely correlated | +2.17% | ||
| PEP - CELH | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.78% | ||
| KO - CELH | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.06% | ||
| KDP - CELH | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.02% | ||
| KOF - CELH | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.26% | ||
More | ||||