Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGSX vs RNPGX
CCGSX vs RNPGX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs RNPGX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$26.34
Change+$0.12 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets423.74M
American Funds New Perspective R6
Price$71.86
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.96B
CCGSX vs RNPGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. RNPGX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Buy and RNPGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPGX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. CCGSX (424M). RNPGX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: RNPGX (0.78) vs CCGSX (0.16). CCGSX was incepted earlier than RNPGX: CCGSX (9 years) vs RNPGX (16 years). CCGSX (1.11) is less costly to investors than RNPGX (0.41). RNPGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGSX (15.00). RNPGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: RNPGX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). RNPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.04 vs. CCGSX (12.38). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 62.23 vs. RNPGX (39.96).
| CCGSX | RNPGX | CCGSX / RNPGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.41 | 256% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.41 | 271% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.853 | 15.623 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 424M | 159B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.78 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.38 | 14.04 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.78 | 35.51 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.23 | 39.96 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.94 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement