Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGSX vs NPFCX
CCGSX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs NPFCX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$27.96
Change+$0.07 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets445.17M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$69.08
Change+$0.35 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
CCGSX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. NPFCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a StrongBuy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. CCGSX (445M). CCGSX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: CCGSX (0.15) vs NPFCX (0.00). CCGSX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: CCGSX (10 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than CCGSX (1.11). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGSX (15.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: NPFCX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.67 vs. NPFCX (10.87). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 48.16 vs. NPFCX (19.69).
| CCGSX | NPFCX | CCGSX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.48 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.48 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.794 | 19.309 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 445M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.67 | 10.87 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.91 | 42.16 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.16 | 19.69 | 245% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 84.03 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers