Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGSX vs NPFCX
CCGSX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs NPFCX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$27.91
Change-$0.43 (-1.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets444.16M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$68.59
Change-$1.15 (-1.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.22B
CCGSX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. NPFCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. CCGSX (444M). CCGSX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: CCGSX (0.15) vs NPFCX (0.00). CCGSX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: CCGSX (10 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than CCGSX (1.11). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGSX (15.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: NPFCX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.40 vs. NPFCX (13.49). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 52.96 vs. NPFCX (28.64).
| CCGSX | NPFCX | CCGSX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.48 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.48 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.580 | 20.449 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 444M | 165B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.40 | 13.49 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.68 | 47.67 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.96 | 28.64 | 185% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.17 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement