Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGSX vs NPFCX
CCGSX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs NPFCX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$28.05
Change+$0.23 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets473.45M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$66.51
Change-$2.33 (-3.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
CCGSX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. NPFCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. CCGSX (473M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: NPFCX (0.34) vs CCGSX (0.00). CCGSX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: CCGSX (10 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than CCGSX (1.11). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. CCGSX (15.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: NPFCX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.53 vs. NPFCX (11.67). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 34.83 vs. NPFCX (11.69).
| CCGSX | NPFCX | CCGSX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.47 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.47 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.337 | 1.526 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 473M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.34 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.53 | 11.67 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.76 | 37.05 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.83 | 11.69 | 298% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 114.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers