Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGSX vs FNPFX
CCGSX vs FNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs FNPFX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$27.91
Change-$0.43 (-1.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets444.16M
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$74.25
Change-$1.24 (-1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.22B
CCGSX vs FNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. FNPFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Buy and FNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. CCGSX (444M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: FNPFX (0.73) vs CCGSX (0.15). CCGSX was incepted earlier than FNPFX: CCGSX (10 years) vs FNPFX (9 years). CCGSX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGSX (15.00). CCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: CCGSX (2500) vs FNPFX (1000000). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.40 vs. FNPFX (13.46). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 52.96 vs. FNPFX (33.30).
| CCGSX | FNPFX | CCGSX / FNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.41 | 256% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.41 | 271% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.580 | 19.565 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 444M | 165B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.73 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.40 | 13.46 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.68 | 50.76 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.96 | 33.30 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement