Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGSX vs FNPFX
CCGSX vs FNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs FNPFX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$28.05
Change+$0.23 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets473.45M
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$71.77
Change-$2.68 (-3.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
CCGSX vs FNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. FNPFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Buy and FNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. CCGSX (473M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: FNPFX (1.29) vs CCGSX (0.00). CCGSX was incepted earlier than FNPFX: CCGSX (10 years) vs FNPFX (9 years). CCGSX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.40). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. CCGSX (15.00). CCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: CCGSX (2500) vs FNPFX (1000000). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.53 vs. FNPFX (13.35). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 34.83 vs. FNPFX (18.39).
| CCGSX | FNPFX | CCGSX / FNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.40 | 263% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.40 | 278% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.337 | 1.628 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 473M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.29 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.53 | 13.35 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.76 | 43.00 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.83 | 18.39 | 189% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers