Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGSX vs FNPFX
CCGSX vs FNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs FNPFX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$27.96
Change+$0.07 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets445.17M
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$74.82
Change+$0.38 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
CCGSX vs FNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. FNPFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a StrongBuy and FNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. CCGSX (445M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: FNPFX (0.74) vs CCGSX (0.15). CCGSX was incepted earlier than FNPFX: CCGSX (10 years) vs FNPFX (9 years). CCGSX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGSX (15.00). CCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: CCGSX (2500) vs FNPFX (1000000). CCGSX (12.67) and FNPFX (12.39) have marching annual gain over last year. CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 48.16 vs. FNPFX (26.08).
| CCGSX | FNPFX | CCGSX / FNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.41 | 256% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.41 | 271% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.794 | 20.483 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 445M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.74 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.67 | 12.39 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.91 | 46.28 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.16 | 26.08 | 185% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers