Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGSX vs CNPFX
CCGSX vs CNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs CNPFX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$28.05
Change+$0.23 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets473.45M
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$70.01
Change-$2.66 (-3.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
CCGSX vs CNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. CNPFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Buy and CNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. CCGSX (473M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: CNPFX (1.17) vs CCGSX (0.00). CCGSX was incepted earlier than CNPFX: CCGSX (10 years) vs CNPFX (23 years). CCGSX (1.11) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.83). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. CCGSX (15.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: CNPFX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.53 vs. CNPFX (13.02). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 34.83 vs. CNPFX (18.03).
| CCGSX | CNPFX | CCGSX / CNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.83 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.83 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.337 | 1.611 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 473M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.17 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.53 | 13.02 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.76 | 41.75 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.83 | 18.03 | 193% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 140.44 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers