Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGSX vs CNPFX
CCGSX vs CNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs CNPFX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$25.59
Change+$0.11 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets411.5M
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$68.61
Change+$0.38 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.22B
CCGSX vs CNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. CNPFX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Buy and CNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. CCGSX (411M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: CNPFX (0.65) vs CCGSX (0.16). CCGSX was incepted earlier than CNPFX: CCGSX (9 years) vs CNPFX (23 years). CCGSX (1.11) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGSX (15.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: CNPFX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.32 vs. CCGSX (8.44). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 66.45 vs. CNPFX (47.85).
| CCGSX | CNPFX | CCGSX / CNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.84 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.84 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.640 | 13.031 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 411M | 156B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.65 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.44 | 11.32 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.70 | 47.79 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.45 | 47.85 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement