Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGSX vs CNPFX
CCGSX vs CNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs CNPFX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$27.55
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets439.03M
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$72.37
Change+$0.14 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.58B
CCGSX vs CNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. CNPFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Hold and CNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. CCGSX (439M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: CNPFX (0.62) vs CCGSX (0.15). CCGSX was incepted earlier than CNPFX: CCGSX (10 years) vs CNPFX (23 years). CCGSX (1.11) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGSX (15.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: CNPFX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX (12.88) and CNPFX (12.86) have marching annual gain over last year. CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 56.86 vs. CNPFX (36.93).
| CCGSX | CNPFX | CCGSX / CNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.84 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.84 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.038 | 19.226 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 439M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.62 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.88 | 12.86 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.61 | 63.24 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.86 | 36.93 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 110.65 | - |