Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGSX vs CNPFX
CCGSX vs CNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs CNPFX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$26.39
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets424.52M
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$69.65
Change+$0.06 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
CCGSX vs CNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. CNPFX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Buy and CNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. CCGSX (425M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: CNPFX (0.65) vs CCGSX (0.16). CCGSX was incepted earlier than CNPFX: CCGSX (9 years) vs CNPFX (23 years). CCGSX (1.11) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGSX (15.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: CNPFX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CNPFX (17.12) and CCGSX (16.67) have marching annual gain over last year. CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 66.09 vs. CNPFX (44.62).
| CCGSX | CNPFX | CCGSX / CNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.84 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.84 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.068 | 14.745 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 425M | 158B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.65 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.67 | 17.12 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.15 | 46.52 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.09 | 44.62 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement