Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGSX vs CNPAX
CCGSX vs CNPAX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs CNPAX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$28.05
Change+$0.23 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets473.45M
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$70.41
Change-$2.56 (-3.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
CCGSX vs CNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. CNPAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Buy and CNPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. CCGSX (473M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: CNPAX (0.99) vs CCGSX (0.00). CCGSX was incepted earlier than CNPAX: CCGSX (10 years) vs CNPAX (24 years). CCGSX (1.11) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. CCGSX (15.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: CNPAX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.53 vs. CNPAX (12.85). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 34.83 vs. CNPAX (17.17).
| CCGSX | CNPAX | CCGSX / CNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.74 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.74 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.337 | 1.602 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 473M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.99 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.53 | 12.85 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.76 | 41.12 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.83 | 17.17 | 203% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 136.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers