Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGSX vs CNPAX
CCGSX vs CNPAX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs CNPAX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$25.59
Change+$0.11 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets411.5M
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$68.93
Change+$0.38 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.22B
CCGSX vs CNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. CNPAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Buy and CNPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. CCGSX (411M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: CNPAX (0.49) vs CCGSX (0.16). CCGSX was incepted earlier than CNPAX: CCGSX (9 years) vs CNPAX (23 years). CCGSX (1.11) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGSX (15.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: CNPAX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.17 vs. CCGSX (8.44). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 66.45 vs. CNPAX (46.68).
| CCGSX | CNPAX | CCGSX / CNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.77 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.77 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.640 | 12.944 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 411M | 156B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.49 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.44 | 11.17 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.70 | 47.11 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.45 | 46.68 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 94.63 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement