Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGSX vs CNPAX
CCGSX vs CNPAX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs CNPAX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$27.91
Change-$0.43 (-1.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets444.16M
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$72.76
Change-$1.21 (-1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.22B
CCGSX vs CNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. CNPAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Buy and CNPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. CCGSX (444M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: CNPAX (0.45) vs CCGSX (0.15). CCGSX was incepted earlier than CNPAX: CCGSX (10 years) vs CNPAX (24 years). CCGSX (1.11) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGSX (15.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: CNPAX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.40 vs. CNPAX (12.99). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 52.96 vs. CNPAX (32.52).
| CCGSX | CNPAX | CCGSX / CNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.77 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.77 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.580 | 19.220 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 444M | 165B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.45 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.40 | 12.99 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.68 | 50.57 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.96 | 32.52 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 104.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement