Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGIX vs RNPGX
CCGIX vs RNPGX Comparison
Open Charts CCGIX vs RNPGX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth Instl
Price$26.16
Change+$0.03 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets415.08M
American Funds New Perspective R6
Price$71.08
Change+$0.22 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets157.43B
CCGIX vs RNPGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGIX vs. RNPGX commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGIX is a Buy and RNPGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPGX has more cash in the bank: 157B vs. CCGIX (415M). RNPGX pays higher dividends than CCGIX: RNPGX (0.78) vs CCGIX (0.27). CCGIX was incepted earlier than RNPGX: CCGIX (9 years) vs RNPGX (16 years). CCGIX (0.86) is less costly to investors than RNPGX (0.41). RNPGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGIX (15.00). RNPGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGIX: RNPGX (250) vs CCGIX (10000). RNPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.39 vs. CCGIX (16.14). CCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 60.80 vs. RNPGX (39.71).
| CCGIX | RNPGX | CCGIX / RNPGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.41 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.41 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.707 | 14.368 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 415M | 157B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 0.78 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.14 | 17.39 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.48 | 39.02 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.80 | 39.71 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 87.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement