Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGIX vs RNPCX
CCGIX vs RNPCX Comparison
Open Charts CCGIX vs RNPCX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth Instl
Price$28.31
Change-$0.45 (-1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets444.16M
American Funds New Perspective R3
Price$71.42
Change-$1.20 (-1.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.22B
CCGIX vs RNPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGIX vs. RNPCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGIX is a Hold and RNPCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPCX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. CCGIX (444M). CCGIX pays higher dividends than RNPCX: CCGIX (0.24) vs RNPCX (0.21). CCGIX was incepted earlier than RNPCX: CCGIX (10 years) vs RNPCX (23 years). RNPCX (1.06) is less costly to investors than CCGIX (0.86). RNPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGIX (15.00). RNPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGIX: RNPCX (250) vs CCGIX (10000). CCGIX (14.67) and RNPCX (14.14) have marching annual gain over last year. CCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 54.89 vs. RNPCX (31.80).
| CCGIX | RNPCX | CCGIX / RNPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.06 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.06 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.805 | 20.892 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 444M | 165B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.21 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.67 | 14.14 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.90 | 49.55 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.89 | 31.80 | 173% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 97.43 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers