Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGIX vs NPFFX
CCGIX vs NPFFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGIX vs NPFFX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth Instl
Price$26.16
Change+$0.03 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets415.08M
American Funds New Perspective F1
Price$70.30
Change+$0.21 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets157.43B
CCGIX vs NPFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGIX vs. NPFFX commentary
Aug 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGIX is a Buy and NPFFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 157B vs. CCGIX (415M). NPFFX pays higher dividends than CCGIX: NPFFX (0.46) vs CCGIX (0.27). CCGIX was incepted earlier than NPFFX: CCGIX (9 years) vs NPFFX (24 years). CCGIX (0.86) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.78). NPFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGIX (15.00). NPFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGIX: NPFFX (250) vs CCGIX (10000). NPFFX (16.91) and CCGIX (16.14) have marching annual gain over last year. CCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 60.80 vs. NPFFX (37.90).
| CCGIX | NPFFX | CCGIX / NPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.78 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.78 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.707 | 14.123 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 415M | 157B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 0.46 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.14 | 16.91 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.48 | 37.89 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.80 | 37.90 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 84.76 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement