Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGIX vs NPFCX
CCGIX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CCGIX vs NPFCX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth Instl
Price$28.31
Change-$0.45 (-1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets444.16M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$68.59
Change-$1.15 (-1.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.22B
CCGIX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGIX vs. NPFCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGIX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. CCGIX (444M). CCGIX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: CCGIX (0.24) vs NPFCX (0.00). CCGIX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: CCGIX (10 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than CCGIX (0.86). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGIX (15.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGIX: NPFCX (250) vs CCGIX (10000). CCGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.67 vs. NPFCX (13.49). CCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 54.89 vs. NPFCX (28.64).
| CCGIX | NPFCX | CCGIX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.48 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.48 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.805 | 20.449 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 444M | 165B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.67 | 13.49 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.90 | 47.67 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.89 | 28.64 | 192% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.17 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement