Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGEX vs RNPFX
CCGEX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGEX vs RNPFX
Calamos Global Equity C
Price$15.16
Change-$0.12 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.79M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$74.03
Change+$0.14 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.58B
CCGEX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGEX vs. RNPFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGEX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. CCGEX (160M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than CCGEX: RNPFX (0.70) vs CCGEX (0.00). CCGEX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: CCGEX (19 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). CCGEX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). CCGEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGEX: RNPFX (250) vs CCGEX (2500). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.09 vs. CCGEX (5.06). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.47 vs. CCGEX (19.09).
| CCGEX | RNPFX | CCGEX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.46 | 467% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.46 | 472% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.902 | 19.326 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.70 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.06 | 13.09 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.70 | 62.51 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.09 | 36.47 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.12 | 100.70 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement