Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGEX vs RNPEX
CCGEX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts CCGEX vs RNPEX
Calamos Global Equity C
Price$15.03
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.39M
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$71.60
Change+$0.37 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.39B
CCGEX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGEX vs. RNPEX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGEX is a Buy and RNPEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. CCGEX (158M). RNPEX pays higher dividends than CCGEX: RNPEX (0.48) vs CCGEX (0.00). CCGEX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: CCGEX (19 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). CCGEX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.76). CCGEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RNPEX (24.00). RNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGEX: RNPEX (250) vs CCGEX (2500). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.73 vs. CCGEX (4.23). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. CCGEX (26.09).
| CCGEX | RNPEX | CCGEX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.76 | 283% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.76 | 286% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.882 | 17.550 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158M | 161B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.23 | 10.73 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.83 | 61.36 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.09 | 40.31 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.56 | 110.48 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement