Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGEX vs RNPAX
CCGEX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts CCGEX vs RNPAX
Calamos Global Equity C
Price$14.88
Change+$0.08 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.81M
American Funds New Perspective R1
Price$68.02
Change+$0.34 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
CCGEX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGEX vs. RNPAX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGEX is a StrongBuy and RNPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. CCGEX (161M). CCGEX (0.00) and RNPAX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCGEX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: CCGEX (19 years) vs RNPAX (23 years). CCGEX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RNPAX (1.49). CCGEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RNPAX (24.00). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGEX: RNPAX (250) vs CCGEX (2500). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.75 vs. CCGEX (-0.07). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.22 vs. CCGEX (7.98).
| CCGEX | RNPAX | CCGEX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.49 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.49 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.706 | 19.271 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.07 | 10.75 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.80 | 41.76 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.98 | 19.22 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.81 | 83.10 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement