Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGEX vs RNPAX
CCGEX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts CCGEX vs RNPAX
Calamos Global Equity C
Price$14.81
Change-$0.37 (-2.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.9M
American Funds New Perspective R1
Price$67.54
Change-$1.13 (-1.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.22B
CCGEX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGEX vs. RNPAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGEX is a Buy and RNPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. CCGEX (160M). CCGEX (0.00) and RNPAX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCGEX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: CCGEX (19 years) vs RNPAX (23 years). CCGEX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RNPAX (1.49). CCGEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RNPAX (24.00). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGEX: RNPAX (250) vs CCGEX (2500). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.37 vs. CCGEX (2.14). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.13 vs. CCGEX (13.31).
| CCGEX | RNPAX | CCGEX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.49 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.49 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.157 | 20.410 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160M | 165B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.14 | 13.37 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.63 | 47.27 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.31 | 28.13 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.80 | 90.25 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement