Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGEX vs RNPAX
CCGEX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts CCGEX vs RNPAX
Calamos Global Equity C
Price$12.31
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.67M
American Funds New Perspective R1
Price$64.94
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
CCGEX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGEX vs. RNPAX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGEX is a Buy and RNPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. CCGEX (163M). CCGEX (0.00) and RNPAX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCGEX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: CCGEX (19 years) vs RNPAX (24 years). CCGEX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RNPAX (1.49). CCGEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RNPAX (24.00). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGEX: RNPAX (250) vs CCGEX (2500). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.31 vs. CCGEX (-6.03). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.37 vs. CCGEX (-5.30).
| CCGEX | RNPAX | CCGEX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.49 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.49 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.373 | 13.870 | -24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.03 | 11.31 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.81 | 48.86 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.30 | 16.37 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.18 | 85.81 | 4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers