Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGEX vs FNPFX
CCGEX vs FNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGEX vs FNPFX
Calamos Global Equity C
Price$14.06
Change+$0.11 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.34M
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$70.26
Change+$0.39 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.22B
CCGEX vs FNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGEX vs. FNPFX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGEX is a Buy and FNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. CCGEX (147M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than CCGEX: FNPFX (0.79) vs CCGEX (0.00). CCGEX was incepted earlier than FNPFX: CCGEX (18 years) vs FNPFX (8 years). CCGEX (2.17) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). CCGEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. FNPFX (24.00). CCGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: CCGEX (2500) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.63 vs. CCGEX (-2.23). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.56 vs. CCGEX (28.28).
| CCGEX | FNPFX | CCGEX / FNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.41 | 524% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.41 | 529% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.275 | 13.140 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 147M | 156B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.79 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.23 | 11.63 | -19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.92 | 47.32 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.28 | 47.56 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers